On foreign policy I could agree with you on stepping away from all conflicts. I think even as libertarian and pacifist as Paul is, he would not be comfortable from withdrawing from everything we've gotten ourselves into. Though I think we need to stop for a second and think about our role as "world police." You talked about how the only way our society is running is because we can control everything, and I don't believe that is necessarily true. Just because our troops are not hanging out in bunkers in some country far away, doesn't mean we can't function in the world economy. China has been keeping an isolationist view for the past 10-15 years and are now expected to be the next super power. You might wonder why terrorist would attack a great country like America, yet you want to resend hundreds of thousands of troops to reoccupy where these terrorist live and possibly lead to another civilian casualty disaster. Seems quite tiring after a while, and even more exhausting on out debt/budget. If you think our country can afford another war and come out on top (Without trying to compare now to the The Depression/World War 2 situation.) then you haven't payed attention enough.

Well to get back on point, I think I'd be more likely to agree with you on abortion Coffin. Aside from the moral debate, I think we can see eye to eye on the fact that every woman should have the choice, but adoption is always the better option.