I feel as if

[Alexx]

we need a nice strategy to implement more activity into the website.
Who's with me?

[GAMEchief]

I've been trying to get ads out there for years.

[Alexx]

I've been trying to get ads out there for years.

I say we do this then.

[GAMEchief]

I mean, I'm all ears. I've been promoting users doing it. Even implemented a referral link in the User CP that grants bonus LGG whenever someone you refer posts.

Your Chao also gets a emotiball if you get a referrer.

[Alexx]

I honestly don't really care for my Chao.. it can die for all I care.. ahaha
but yeah we definitely need to do that again.

P.S. I responded to your wall post.

[The Unintelligible]

I've been trying to get ads out there for years.

Site needs more appeal than what we have now as well.

Advertising isn't the sole problem.

[323]

Site needs more appeal than what we have now as well.

Advertising isn't the sole problem.

This. There isn't anything GOOD here. Also, chaos are retarded, no one cares about them.

[C0FFINCASE]

This. There isn't anything GOOD here. Also, chaos are retarded, no one cares about them.

You shut your whore mouth. I love my chao and I'll skull fuck you into submission if you ever say that again.

But we actually have two issues. One is we don't have a core focus with anything relating to it for a community to form around and we don't have advertising.
To some degree we could only really do anything about the latter. The users themselves have to pick the thing they wish to coalesce around otherwise we just end up with another empty sub-forum.

[GAMEchief]

Site needs more appeal than what we have now as well.

Advertising isn't the sole problem.

I agree, and I'm all ears.

I think Logical Gaia has potential, but I can't develop that shit solo. It takes ages.

I'm big of the Valve business model of dispersing development among users -- like Soph's graphics talents go towards Chao.

If someone can do something to contribute, I am perfectly willing to endorse it.

[Alexx]

we need Chad back

[GAMEchief]

Contact 'im?