Tattoos

[The Unintelligible]

tl;drs : The implication of this symbol can range from a brilliant and informative disquisition being given up due to lack of endurance, interest, or INTELLIGENCE , to a clustered composition of such utter failure to communicate that it has left the capable reader with a headache. WIKI.

I see a lot of this wrong with your intelligence.

I didn't want to have to call Lostinthedark out because he isn't really a bad person--so much as someone who got carried away in a topic he's devoted to. But I guess you'll accept that role for him.

--

Let's begin:

First and foremost: You're getting information from wiki rather than defining your own assertion. On top of the fact that you're an idiot, you speak on behalf of intelligence and you weren't even capable of paraphrasing. Can you say irony?

Look at your signature - Torrents for Dummies, License plate in Photoshop. My god. You're not only technologically impaired, but you also come off as autistic.

Members of LG I Respect (unnecessarily capitalized "respect" by the way):

>implying anyone cares who you respect.

Also I noticed that you mentioned BooBearSH. After I saw this name I facepalmed. You do realize this is the idiot who can't actually program and thinks PHP is superior to Python, right? You do realize this is the idiot who said most programmers have Aspergers Syndrome with no actual basis, right? I bet you didn't you little retard.

Regarding the context of the definition of tl;dr - invalid. Plain and simple. The criteria defined was lack of endurance, interest, or intelligence. Guess what actually pertained to me? None. This isn't an interest matter, nor endurance since it isn't argumentative. And the fact that you and him are even participating for that matter means it automatically rules out intelligence.

In regard to the actual "argument vs. argument" basis, I was correct. His only argument was "living in the moment." That's the typical hipster/hippy/druggy/pothead/scene kid solace for doing stupid, inane things. In this case, it's his for getting a tattoo solely because he thinks it's "cool." I provided solid, pragmatic reasoning as to why I don't like tattoos. Factual and not opinionated information.

His second post was nothing more than noise. Noise that again I'm not interested in seeing because it's irrelevant noise that I don't care about. It was his three paragraph opinion on the matter because again this type of discussion is subjective.

--

Now next time actually think before you post, you illiterate imbecile.