There's make up to conceal tattoo's now so fuck it.
I like how unintelligible is using Ad Hominem.
Results 1 to 32 of 32
Thread: Tattoos
Hybrid View
- 04 Jul. 2012 06:34am #1
Last edited by Alexx; 04 Jul. 2012 at 06:44am.
- 04 Jul. 2012 07:06am #2
Is more than half of LG's population legally retarded? Aside from the fact that ad hominem is limited to actual debates (which means you're using it wrong), my use of it is warranted. He insulted my intelligence despite me being right due to his tattoo bias. If you aren't prepared to be insulted back, never insult anyone. Period.
I also corrected him on pretty much everything else:
Regarding the context of the definition of tl;dr - invalid. Plain and simple. The criteria defined was lack of endurance, interest, or intelligence. Guess what actually pertained to me? None. This isn't an interest matter, nor endurance since it isn't argumentative. And the fact that you and him are even participating for that matter means it automatically rules out intelligence.
In regard to the actual "argument vs. argument" basis, I was correct. His only argument was "living in the moment." That's the typical hipster/hippy/druggy/pothead/scene kid solace for doing stupid, inane things. In this case, it's his for getting a tattoo solely because he thinks it's "cool." I provided solid, pragmatic reasoning as to why I don't like tattoos. Factual and not opinionated information.
His second post was nothing more than noise. Noise that again I'm not interested in seeing because it's irrelevant noise that I don't care about. It was his three paragraph opinion on the matter because again this type of discussion is subjective.Last edited by The Unintelligible; 04 Jul. 2012 at 07:08am.