I don't think this aspect of time travel should be discussed. The energy needed to create a wormhole required for time travel is unfeasable. Better to think of it as a thought experiment, to theoretically determine if it's possible and the outcomes that would occur should it be accomplished.
Did I miss something in physics? Exceeding the speed of light, can you explain the reasoning behind your statement a little bit? I have heard some physicists argue that when near a black hole, relative to an observer far away from the hole you could appear to be traveling FTL, and relative to them you may go back in time, but I think 99.9% of physicists will agree that traveling faster than the speed of light is impossible.
That isn't what occurs when you travel to the future. In fact, traveling to the future is the only form of time travel right now that we know is possible. Google the twin paradox. If we were to jump in to a space ship traveling 99.99% the speed of light, and traveled for one year before coming back to earth, 150 years may have passed on earth (not the exact amount - would have to do the math). We would have therefore traveled 149 years in the future, entirely possible.
That's just a variation of the grandfather paradox.
No reality until past reached you? o.o Read above post.
Faster than speed of light is theoretically meant to take you back in time, not forward.
Results 1 to 38 of 38
Thread: Time Travel
Hybrid View
- 28 Dec. 2009 05:10am #1
- 28 Dec. 2009 04:33pm #2
Global Moderator Literally Hitler
Morbidly Obese
Bird Jesus
- Age
- 35
- Join Date
- Nov. 2009
- Location
- The Land Of Ooo
- Posts
- 8,569
- Reputation
- 711
- LCash
- 100.00
It not feasible to consider making one now, but we could go run into one if we found such a cosmic event.
The key point is that "relative" time travel isn't time travel. Black hole is basically spacetime being pulled in by some massive thing with an insane gravitational force that is basically bending reality around itself. Things there stop or slow down compared to things outside. Relative part is they slow down, we keep going, so time travel isn't so much they went forward as slowed down.That's the argument. Some people call that time travel,and others don't. To me its more of a you've gone out and slowed yourself down and every thing else kept going. Plus you can't really travel at the speed of light, it reaches its speed due to its dual nature as wave and particle.
- 29 Dec. 2009 01:30am #3
- Age
- 34
- Join Date
- Mar. 2007
- Location
- Death Star
- Posts
- 6,688
- Reputation
- 757
- LCash
- 100.00
- Awards
In theory the event of time traveling would require the use of a fuel with an infinitely negative amount of power, in a sense, Dark Matter, the matter that all of space and many of the anomolies of space are created of and built around. And as Dark Matter is the only atomic thing in all of existance (as far as we know) with an infinitely negative amount of energy to use, it would allow for it take place, or to be that cosmic event that you mentioned.
Originally Posted by C0FFINCASE
Voted Hottest Male Member
Crowned King of Logical Gamers
18 Years of Logical Service.