Still, assuming there is no natural law, nor anything else, people eventually form groups, which will, with time, get regulated. Anarchy is just a temporary state...
Results 1 to 33 of 33
Thread: Anarchy
Hybrid View
- 04 Jan. 2011 04:40pm #1
Administrator Best Avatar Award
- Age
- 32
- Join Date
- Nov. 2009
- Location
- Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Posts
- 6,251
- Reputation
- 790
- LCash
- 11.65
- 05 Jan. 2011 08:13am #2
- 05 Jan. 2011 01:23pm #3
Global Moderator Literally Hitler
Morbidly Obese
Bird Jesus
- Age
- 35
- Join Date
- Nov. 2009
- Location
- The Land Of Ooo
- Posts
- 8,569
- Reputation
- 711
- LCash
- 14.12
Kind of my point from the start.
One person or group capitalizes on the situation to gain power and either they are successful or there is a collective backlash that leads to revolution for one form of government or another.
Interestingly there is no state in anarchy. State means there is a government, anarchy is really just a bunch of individuals roaming around. Its doubtful they'd have established boarders.
- 05 Jan. 2011 08:15pm #4
In a state of anarchy in the US, there are already civilian militia groups in existence and survivalist groups... and, as history has shown on multiple occasions, the military is very likely to seize power. Borders aren't altogether too difficult to establish, though they might be a tad vague.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]