LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThe tragic death of a trainer at Sea World last week revived a number of long simmering questions. While we still grapple with "how did this happen?" the central question for many revolves around the role of large mammals -- like Tilikum the killer whale -- in zoos and aquariums: Should they be there or not?
More...
Results 1 to 5 of 5
- 02 Mar. 2010 11:10pm #1
Opinion: The case for captive animals
- 02 Mar. 2010 11:37pm #2
Hell no...its not called a killer whale for no reason...plus its killed 2 other people
- 02 Mar. 2010 11:42pm #3
fuck it just sell it to the japs they will by whales. save them the trouble of one crew of ppl to go hunting them.
- 02 Mar. 2010 11:47pm #4Administrator
Global Moderator Literally Hitler
Morbidly Obese
Bird Jesus
- Age
- 35
- Join Date
- Nov. 2009
- Location
- The Land Of Ooo
- Posts
- 8,569
- Reputation
- 711
- LCash
- 0.00
- Awards
It can be there if we want it to be. An for the most part we do. The people that interact with the animals know the risks, they sign wavers and contracts. The trainers are trained to interact with the animals and they noticed that the whale was pissed off before the show, and decided to ignore that fact and thus someone paid the price. Not the whale's fault its the trainer's.
Originally Posted by Raivu 
Originally Posted by La Vie Cruelle Originally Posted by La Vie Cruelle
- 03 Mar. 2010 01:33am #5Quote Kingpin
- Join Date
- Dec. 2009
- Location
- IN YO FRIDGE, BITCHLET! <3
- Posts
- 1,202
- Reputation
- 22
- LCash
- 0.00
I don't think they should be caged. We can't truly control them. That whale didn't go berserk, it went Whale.
