No, he's an agnostic as he said. He didn't say that a god didn't create the universe, just that none of the BS earthly religions represent that god. That would be deism, and since he's not sure that a deistic god exists (and he isn't denying that a deistic god exist), he's agnostic.
I'm not sure if it's considered fact until we can reproduce it. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence for sure, and it makes perfect sense without the need of a creator being. I'm not disagreeing that this is how it happened, but I don't think the theory is self-supporting enough (like evolution) to be called fact, even though it makes epic sense.but in all fairness science proves how the world was started, through facts such as the big bang can still be heard throughout space, it's just religion has a sort of cult following ^^.
True. This has been proven. A person gets his religion from his parents >90% of the time. Muslim parents who adopt Christian children will raise Muslim children. Religion isn't genetic, and it isn't divinely granted upon you. It comes from your parents, and it's as simple as that.Still - the side you choose to believe is generally, but not limited to, how you're braught up. Those braught up in a religious house would very rarely choose to believe the scientific view; which is a waste of some brilliant minds.
Results 1 to 40 of 55
Thread: Religion vs. Science
Threaded View
- 16 Nov. 2009 01:53pm #11