Restricted subforum requirements
Hello everyone.
In Logical Gamers, specifically the Gaia forums, members will post useless, annoying, and overall stupid replies to threads just to get past the subforum requirements. This requirement stops people from leeching Logical Gamers, yes, but it comes with a price of having to deal with the same person(s) shitposting for three days until they get what they want. It makres me wish there wasn't a requirement at all.
I would like to suggest that the requirements to gain access to subforums be based off account age, reputation, and or LGG/donations.
The purpose of a reputation restriction is to reward those who contribute positively to Logical Gamers with access to restricted subforums, instead of encouraging a series of terrible posts. Alternatively, if someone doesn't want to post here but wants to view the subforums, we can make them pay for it with real money.
What does everyone else think?
In Logical Gamers, specifically the Gaia forums, members will post useless, annoying, and overall stupid replies to threads just to get past the subforum requirements. This requirement stops people from leeching Logical Gamers, yes, but it comes with a price of having to deal with the same person(s) shitposting for three days until they get what they want. It makres me wish there wasn't a requirement at all.
I would like to suggest that the requirements to gain access to subforums be based off account age, reputation, and or LGG/donations.
The purpose of a reputation restriction is to reward those who contribute positively to Logical Gamers with access to restricted subforums, instead of encouraging a series of terrible posts. Alternatively, if someone doesn't want to post here but wants to view the subforums, we can make them pay for it with real money.
What does everyone else think?