A preserved archive of the Logical Gamers community forums, 2009-2025. The original threads and posts, served read-only. Registration, posting and private messages are gone for good.

Do you know

753 views · started by C0FFINCASE ·
#1
Do you know
...who Ronnie James Dio is, kids?
#2
The guy who replaced Ozzy while in detox.
#3
Drakonid wrote:
The guy who replaced Ozzy while in detox.


The guy who took over when Ozzy left, was then kicked out and started his own band.
#4
same thing...
#5
Dio.
Played Push if I remember correctly.

Was in the Tenacious D movie.
#6
He played a lot of stuff. Rainbow In The Dark, Holy Diver, Don't Talk To Strangers, ect.
Yes, he was in the Tenacious D movie cause JB loves him.
#7
Eh, I only ever heard Push.
Never really looked into him, I was jazzing on the D at the time.
#8
Kain wrote:
Eh, I only ever heard Push.
Never really looked into him, I was jazzing on the D at the time.


I'd heard about him before The D, but they got me too look into him more. His music is a lot like Zeppelin fused with 80s metal. Its wicked awesome.
#9
No I havent
#11
It was expected of you not to.

Well I don't necessarily listen to has beens :[
#12
Lady Gaga wrote:
Well I don't necessarily listen to has beens :[


Give it a break gaga isn't good or original. As a matter of fact she worships these so called has beens and rips off them without the courtesy of bothering to reference them. Here look, her style, and the way her songs are built is all stolen. At least the has beens made their songs mean something, at least there was method and meaning to their madness.
#13
C0FFINCASE wrote:
Give it a break gaga isn't good or original. As a matter of fact she worships these so called has beens and rips off them without the courtesy of bothering to reference them. Here look, her style, and the way her songs are built is all stolen. At least the has beens made their songs mean something, at least there was method and meaning to their madness.

Because I totally compared the two. And obviously Gaga is doing something better if she is making more money and getting a lot of award nominations
#14
Lady Gaga wrote:
Because I totally compared the two. And obviously Gaga is doing something better if she is making more money and getting a lot of award nominations


She's not. She ripped everything she is and does off David Bowie and Freddy Mercury. She is have the same amount of success they did starting off because she remind people of them except while they stood for things and their songs had deep meanings, she stands for nothing and her songs are garbage. When the test of time is over the originals who are still making money, preforming, writing, and winning awards will be remembered and she will be footnote remembered by few and only as a cheap knockoff.
You can't even argue she isn't ripping off Bowie since she loves to show up in exact copies of his outfits and makeup.
#15
C0FFINCASE wrote:
She's not. She ripped everything she is and does off David Bowie and Freddy Mercury. She is have the same amount of success they did starting off because she remind people of them except while they stood for things and their songs had deep meanings, she stands for nothing and her songs are garbage. When the test of time is over the originals who are still making money, preforming, writing, and winning awards will be remembered and she will be footnote remembered by few and only as a cheap knockoff.
You can't even argue she isn't ripping off Bowie since she loves to show up in exact copies of his outfits and makeup.

Those are her influences, they had influences too. Every artist isn't 100% original. Just a fun fact
#16
Lady Gaga wrote:
Those are her influences, they had influences too. Every artist isn't 100% original. Just a fun fact


Influence and copy cat are very different. Influence means you like them, incorporate elements not copy everything about them exactly.
#17
Lady Gaga wrote:
Those are her influences, they had influences too. Every artist isn't 100% original. Just a fun fact

Just for the record, Freddy Mercury was 100% original in most things, and is considered a precursor in a lot of genres...
#18
Drakonid wrote:
Just for the record, Freddy Mercury was 100% original in most things, and is considered a precursor in a lot of genres...


Same goes for Bowie. There was nothing like Bowie before.
#19
C0FFINCASE wrote:
Influence and copy cat are very different. Influence means you like them, incorporate elements not copy everything about them exactly.

:rolleyes: because I'm sure you've listened to her music and found her music and her influences music to be exactly the same thing. Also their style of clothing wasn't original; either, people dressed like they did before them. Like I said, NO ONE IS ORIGINAL. And Gaga dresses more like Madonna than whoever you are comparing Gaga to.

Drakonid wrote:
Just for the record, Freddy Mercury was 100% original in most things, and is considered a precursor in a lot of genres...

Woah he had influences too! So not "100%" original either
#20
I am aware that he had influences, but he is one of the best vocalists in music history.
#21
Drakonid wrote:
I am aware that he had influences, but he is one of the best vocalists in music history.

First of all, if you knew he had influences why did you say he was "100% original"
And saying he was "the best vocalist evarrr" doesnt make him more original, it just means he improved what he learned from other artists.
#22
Drakonid wrote:
Just for the record, Freddy Mercury was 100% original in most things, and is considered a precursor in a lot of genres...


Now, what does it says there?