Read-only archive

A preserved archive of the Logical Gamers community forums, 2009-2025. The original threads and posts, served read-only. Registration, posting and private messages are gone for good.

RapidShare No Limit DLer?

791 views · started by ʝдɮ ·
#1
RapidShare No Limit DLer?
Edit: Trojan
#2
"and get all the credit"

So you're saying, you'd say you made it otherwise?... :|

Warez, waste of time. Person copies off person, three copy off that person, three copy off of each of those three, here we are.
#3
No, I'm saying you get to post it, it will undoubtedly get stickied, and you can have all of the fame.
#4
ʝдɮ;74009 wrote:
No, I'm saying you get to post it, it will undoubtedly get stickied, and you can have all of the fame.


... There are many of these RS downloader shit...
#5
ʝдɮ;74009 wrote:
No, I'm saying you get to post it, it will undoubtedly get stickied, and you can have all of the fame.


the fame? :eek:
#6
NotNeccesary wrote:
the fame? :eek:


Yes, the fame :P
#7
Kids. Let me explain.

Either this will be a download manager.

OR

This will have malware. Even if the scan says otherwise.
#8
I dunno man, that's why I posted it here instead of warez. Deleting link?
#9
send me a link to where you found that link.
#10
IDK man, people with like 1.5k posts are givin it the thumbs up
#11
ʝдɮ;74063 wrote:
IDK man, people with like 1.5k posts are givin it the thumbs up


You = fail. Just move on to another thread and don't worry about this no limiter...
#12
You know how fucking annoying it is to have to wait 15 minutes between downloads? DL super slow? And sometimes not be able to DL because to many people have recently DLed it? Fucking annoying
#13
ʝдɮ;74067 wrote:
You know how fucking annoying it is to have to wait 15 minutes between downloads? DL super slow? And sometimes not be able to DL because to many people have recently DLed it? Fucking annoying


Yeah, actually, I do. But, if you don't even remember where you got this, why are would we care about it? Find the link where it came from or we're gonna assume it's you.(not really, but still)
#14
I PMed the link to Plobby like 20 minutes ago, right after he posted.
#15
god just use j-downloader. as far as i know it allows you to skip the 15 minutes in between... i think.
#16
Link me pl0x
#18
there's no freaking link, google j-downloader it's completely freeware with no limits.
#19
Well to download it they have to upload it, and for them to upload it there must be a link.
#20
BooBearSH wrote:
... There are many of these RS downloader shit...

lol this. All free host download time requirements are just JavaScript.

<number>
Every second, decrease <number> by one.
If <number> is 0, display <download link>.

Do you know how easy it is to make a bot that scans the page for <download link> and just displays it regardless of <number>? It's fucking easy, that's how easy it is. If you have Greasemonkey, there are more scripts to do this than you'd know what to do with. If you have Firefox, there's an extension that does this too.

SO LOL @ TROJAN
#21
Except for the fact that there is more to download wait time then just the 90 something seconds
#22
Cute, you're acting like you know what you're talking about. :)

I've personally bypassed every wait time on every free host. Including ShareCash, which has the hardest, as it's not time-based. (Although I think they may have changed their system.) It is entirely time-based. The entire code is precisely what I posted. Every second, it checks the number. If it's not 0, it decreases it, and checks again in a second. You can completely bypass the entire wait by setting it to 0 instantly.
I believe the RapidShare code for doing so is:
javascript:var c = 0;void(0);
But that may have been for another site.
#23
It counts the amount of times that people have downloaded that file. Unless you can change their internal clock... :/
#24
GAMEchief wrote:
Cute, you're acting like you know what you're talking about. :)

I've personally bypassed every wait time on every free host. Including ShareCash, which has the hardest, as it's not time-based. (Although I think they may have changed their system.) It is entirely time-based. The entire code is precisely what I posted. Every second, it checks the number. If it's not 0, it decreases it, and checks again in a second. You can completely bypass the entire wait by setting it to 0 instantly.
I believe the RapidShare code for doing so is:
javascript:var c = 0;void(0);
But that may have been for another site.


When tried, the download link shows but when you click it it gives

ERROR

You want to download the following file:
RapidShare: 1-CLICK Web hosting - Easy Filehosting | 84485 KB

The download cannot be provided. Please check, if your browser supports Javascript.


So you fail and jab wins
#25
ʝдɮ;74144 wrote:
It counts the amount of times that people have downloaded that file. Unless you can change their internal clock... :/

What does that have to do with how long you waited? It's been downloaded 10 times, therefore you didn't wait the full 30 seconds? A site can very well log file times, but they don't. Firstly, because undownloaded files would whore up their log space. "At [time], [user] can download [file]." If [user] never downloads [file], that permission will be stored there for quite a while. For such large sites, that's not a good thing. It's complicated to calculate how long to store that data. You can't erase the permission too soon, because you don't know when they're going to click it - they may have left the window open until the timer went away and did something else, only to find they can't download the file when they return. You can't erase it too late, because the longer you wait, the more of these permissions that get built up, the slower the site loads.
The best option, and what they do, is to not log permissions at all. Just redirect to the file when the timer runs out. How do I know this? As I said before, I've bypassed the timers on *every* famous free host by doing nothing buy using just JavaScript to decrease the timer prematurely to 0.
So, @Minora, I win. GTFO. That code was off the top of my head.[/file][/user][/file][/user][/time]
#26
GAMEchief wrote:
What does that have to do with how long you waited? It's been downloaded 10 times, therefore you didn't wait the full 30 seconds? A site can very well log file times, but they don't. Firstly, because undownloaded files would whore up their log space. "At [time], [user] can download [file]." If [user] never downloads [file], that permission will be stored there for quite a while. For such large sites, that's not a good thing. It's complicated to calculate how long to store that data. You can't erase the permission too soon, because you don't know when they're going to click it - they may have left the window open until the timer went away and did something else, only to find they can't download the file when they return. You can't erase it too late, because the longer you wait, the more of these permissions that get built up, the slower the site loads.
The best option, and what they do, is to not log permissions at all. Just redirect to the file when the timer runs out. How do I know this? As I said before, I've bypassed the timers on *every* famous free host by doing nothing buy using just JavaScript to decrease the timer prematurely to 0.
So, @Minora, I win. GTFO. That code was off the top of my head.[/file][/user][/file][/user][/time]


You know what's funny is rapidshare does exactly that. Leave for a while once the timer finishes and you have to restart the timer.
#27
Oh, yeah, you're right. It's not possible or anything, even though I've done it. I must have forgotten that I used magic to do it, instead of JavaScript. Silly me.
#28
Minora wrote:
So you fail and jab wins


Jak bishy Jak