Yeah
I dont know when did we start giving infractions for spam inside the junkyard but thats the dumbest thing i have ever seen happen on lg right now.
Mr unitllegible go read the rules.
Mr unitllegible go read the rules.
The Unintelligible wrote:>Dumbest thing I have ever seen happen on LG
No sir, that would be you.
I didn't hand out an infraction, I give warnings where appropriate. It's simply an indicator of stop spamming like a retard.

Taz wrote:Let him release his anger its bad to have it balled up inside.
The Unintelligible wrote:People who defend retards are bad people. I'm ashamed of you, Clover.
CL0V3R wrote:It's still gonna make him look bad as a mod yo.
With great mods come great responsibility...
To filter through Q_Q users in the most tactful of ways.
CL0V3R wrote:
Actually I'm not defending Taz' actions. I'm just commenting on how this could be better handled yo.
Taz is acting like a kid, just delete his topics and tell him to calm down.
The only thing you're doing is making people want to act out with your actions fooo'.
The Unintelligible wrote:You misunderstand. I handled this situation perfectly. Being mod doesn't warrant me to sugar coat it. Simply put: Taz is a retard. I warned/infracted him for it. It can't get any simpler than that.
Calling him out for seething is in no way "being a bad mod" lol.
CL0V3R wrote:Then again you have to think how this looks to new users. A lot of people are sensitive.
Especially because aren't we thinking of bringing in the neopets crowd?
If you constantly call people out for being a retard some people might just avoid posting all together.
Edit: This is not bring in the fact Taz did fuck up.
The Unintelligible wrote:I think you need to look back at this situation from square 1. Taz is throwing a fit right now and what you're doing is enabling him.
I'll do my job and you do yours. I don't see any other way of dealing with this. I handled it the best way I know how and it's been pretty effective thus far until you intervened.
CL0V3R wrote:Look gonna bring this to pms so it's not in the open dawg.
The Unintelligible wrote:PMs? That's fine. But I totally and 100% understand what you're saying. My powers are limited. I can't lock or delete his topics.
The obvious conclusion here is that you're looking at this from the wrong perspective. He was given an innocuous warning. That's all. As a result he threw a fit. His fit was just about subsided before you decided to comment, which only further enabled him.
Yes, as a moderator I understand that I should be less hostile and direct. That's not my way of moderating. The whole issue was already dealt with. But yeah, thanks for trying to help.
The Unintelligible wrote:PMs? That's fine. But I totally and 100% understand what you're saying. My powers are limited. I can't lock or delete his topics.
The obvious conclusion here is that you're looking at this from the wrong perspective. He was given an innocuous warning. That's all. As a result he threw a fit. His fit was just about subsided before you decided to comment, which only further enabled him.
Yes, as a moderator I understand that I should be less hostile and direct. That's not my way of moderating. The whole issue was already dealt with. But yeah, thanks for trying to help.

Taz wrote:You must not know me if you think she enabled me. But alright just dont be mad and go to sleep happy big boy
The Unintelligible wrote:The only thing I currently know and want to know about you is that you aren't very bright.
She enabled you because you have the demeanor of a child. In this instance you were an upset child. My job is to put upset children in their places. And that's what I did.
Look at the end result of that. Throwing around "mad" because you're angry that I owned you. Get used to it Taz bby. <3

Flareboy323 wrote:This thread needs to be moved to the arguments subforum.
>ITT mad people
The Unintelligible wrote:^ True story. And I didn't even warn him, Mr. Taz.