Read-only archive

A preserved archive of the Logical Gamers community forums, 2009-2025. The original threads and posts, served read-only. Registration, posting and private messages are gone for good.

Lets Hate on Gamechief because that's the adult thing to do

3.6k views · started by jacklanister · · closed · page 1 of 2
#1
Lets Hate on Gamechief because that's the adult thing to do
hi

10charactersexpressingmyhatredforgamechief

-------------------Mod Note------------------------
"I've gone ahead and clarified the title, and stickied this thread since it's important enough to you to make it as public as possible.
Every time I get online, there always seems to be at least one. So to clean up the JY a bit so you don't have to go through a page or two of Gamechief threads, I thought I'd sticky one just for the haters out there.

Let me know when you've learned something"

-Raivu
#2
I realize (or more specifically realized) it, but I've chosen to either accept it and/or ignore it. It's pretty futile to do anything else really.

And I don't really hate him per say. But I detest his stupidity and what he stands for.
#3
How do you spell "band wagon"?
I need to spell band wagon.
#4
Kain wrote:
How do you spell "band wagon"?
I need to spell band wagon.


How does hating GAMEchief and sharing the mutual opinion of him being an idiot have anything to do with bang wagoning? I don't think you think things out too thoroughly before you type.
#5
you said per say lOl
#6
jacklanister wrote:
you said per say lOl


I know it's actually per se. But "per se" isn't exactly what you'd call a clear English word. Its pronunciation would probably throw the reader off entirely. Per say is just its onomatopoeia. A more convenient way to spell it out.
#7
The Unintelligible wrote:
How does mutually hating GAMEchief and sharing the mutual (again mutual) opinion of him being an idiot have anything to do with bang wagoning? I don't think you think things out too thoroughly before you type.


He obviously sees you as some sort of monolith of truth (seeing as you were apparently one of the first people he talked to on here) and is only following you because he believes you are an infallible beacon of truth.
His only interaction with GAMEchief before he started 'hating' him, was in the GAMEchief appreciation day thread.
He just wants to be a kewl kid.


also I'm pulling this defense out of my ass, I never think before I post and I never have, deal w/ it
#8
Probably so. I'm not sure. I was looking at it from a logical perspective. He seems to hate GAMEchief. At best I only dislike the guy and it's only because I think he's dumb.
#9
Wow, you assume as much as a five year old child, I do not hate gamechief, he's probably alright, whether or not 'The Unintelligible' believes he stupid, I'm just poking fun at gamechief, it's called having fun on a boring ass forum site, stop being so srs.
#10
Also, I like how my post about liking GAMEchief exploded into HURF DURF Y SO EGO but this thread didn't.

I'd be offended if Civilization 4 wasn't holding so much of my att-GOD DAMN IT WANG KON, FUCK OFF WITH YER COWS
#11
@KAIN not FROGMAN
jacklanister wrote:
Wow, you assume as much as a five year old child, I do not hate gamechief, he's probably alright, whether or not 'The Unintelligible' believes he stupid, I'm just poking fun at gamechief, it's called having fun on a boring ass forum site, stop being so srs.
#12
jacklanister wrote:
Wow, you assume as much as a five year old child, I do not hate gamechief, he's probably alright, whether or not 'The Unintelligible' believes he stupid, I'm just poking fun at gamechief, it's called having fun on a boring ass forum site, stop being so srs.


I never take anything seriously.

If you wanna have fun, avoid:
1. Mentioning GAMEchief
2. Mentioning Unintelligiblueberries

Both situations involve the thread becoming some kind of giant pissing match
#13
Kain wrote:
Also, I like how my post about liking GAMEchief exploded into HURF DURF Y SO EGO but this thread didn't.

I'd be offended if Civilization 4 wasn't holding so much of my att-GOD DAMN IT WANG KON, FUCK OFF WITH YER COWS


Your thread had egoistic implications. He didn't mention anyone other than himself and GAMEchief in this thread. He is also offering to acknowledge anyone else who shares his point of view.
#14
He's also implying that people that don't agree with him should not post in this thread, implying they're not good enough for him.

Seems awfully egotistical to me.

"I'm right, you're wrong, don't talk to me unless you agree with me."
#15
Kain wrote:
He's also implying that people that don't agree with him should not post in this thread, implying they're not good enough for him.

Seems awfully egotistical to me.

"I'm right, you're wrong, don't talk to me unless you agree with me."


He didn't imply that in any way, shape or form. It seems you're jumping to the conclusion that he's implying that.

Your thread was sufficiently egoistic (or could be considered so) suffice to say. His thread is as he said "joking around and poking fun at Gamechief." Otherwise I still have no idea how he's implying that anyone else who doesn't agree shouldn't talk to him.
#16
The Unintelligible wrote:
He didn't imply that in any way, shape or form. It seems you're jumping to the conclusion that he's implying that.

Your thread was sufficiently egoistic (or could be considered so) suffice to say. His thread is as he said "joking around and poking fun at Gamechief." Otherwise I still have no idea how he's implying that anyone else who doesn't agree shouldn't talk to him.

Look at the thread title.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

He's implying that people who don't agree should not come in here.
#17
Kain wrote:
Look at the thread title.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

He's implying that people who don't agree should not come in here.


Uh, I've seen the thread title. Telling people who agree with him come here doesn't carry the assumption that those who don't agree with him shouldn't come altogether.

In short, he's telling people who agree to come. People who share his opinion. He doesn't mention anything about those who disagree. That wasn't implied nor insinuated.
#18
The Unintelligible wrote:
Uh, I've seen the thread title. Telling people who agree with him come here doesn't carry the assumption that those who don't agree with him shouldn't come altogether.

In short, he's telling people who agree to come. People who share his opinion. He doesn't mention anything about those who disagree. That wasn't implied nor insinuated.


When you go out in public, and go to the restrooms, do you see the sign labelled 'Women' as simply, "Women are encouraged to go here, but nobody else has to stay out"?

It's implied that only women are allowed.
#19
Kain wrote:
When you go out in public, and go to the restrooms, do you see the sign labelled 'Women' as simply, "Women are encouraged to go here, but nobody else has to stay out"?

It's implied that only women are allowed.


Your analogy doesn't fit the parallel between your thread and his at all. Of course it's implying women are only allowed to come in. That's for privacy/sex purposes. This is different. He's not telling anyone who doesn't agree that they aren't welcome here. He didn't imply "I'm right, you're wrong. Deal with it." Not in the least. Your assumptions are entirely invalid.
#20
Kain wrote:
When you go out in public, and go to the restrooms, do you see the sign labelled 'Women' as simply, "Women are encouraged to go here, but nobody else has to stay out"?

It's implied that only women are allowed.


Your analogy doesn't fit the parallel between your thread and his at all. Of course it's implying women are only allowed to come in. That's for privacy/sex purposes. This is different. He's not telling anyone who doesn't agree that they aren't welcome here. He didn't imply "I'm right, you're wrong. Deal with it." Not in the least. Your assumptions are entirely invalid.
#21
Is it just me, or is jacklanister obsessed with Unintelligible? If Unintelligible hates GAMEchief, suddenly jack does too. If Unintelligible likes a programming language, jack does too.
#22
The Unintelligible wrote:
Your analogy doesn't fit the parallel between your thread and his at all. Of course it's implying women are only allowed to come in. That's for privacy/sex purposes. This is different. He's not telling anyone who doesn't agree that they aren't welcome here. He didn't imply "I'm right, you're wrong. Deal with it." Not in the least. Your assumptions are entirely invalid.

Deal with it.
Flareboy323 wrote:
Is it just me, or is jacklanister obsessed with Unintelligible? If Unintelligible hates GAMEchief, suddenly jack does too. If Unintelligible likes a programming language, jack does too.

#23
Kain wrote:
Deal with it.


I can deal with you being incorrect, sure.

"VIP members only." This means VIP members are only allowed in wherever. It doesn't necessarily mean "non-VIP members aren't welcome. I'm right, you're wrong, deal with it." Unless otherwise stated so explicitly one cannot make that assumption because it isn't justified. "VIP members only - non-VIP members can jump in a river. Deal with it." His thread doesn't involve an iota of ego or arrogance. Or at least to a considerable degree.

Debating about pointless things is rather...pointless. But I'm more than positive you're wrong in this instance.
#24
Flareboy323 wrote:
Is it just me, or is jacklanister obsessed with Unintelligible? If Unintelligible hates GAMEchief, suddenly jack does too. If Unintelligible likes a programming language, jack does too.


Jack doesn't program though. I don't hate Gamechief either. Jack acted on his own accord.

I don't think Jack is obsessed with me.

Well, maybe just a tad bit. But my point still remains.
#25
Lol also, was it really necessary to sticky this thread?
#26
I figure if everyone hates Gamechief so much to keep talking shit and making threads about him, and it means enough to everybody to make a thread about it, I might as well sticky it to avoid a whole page of GameChief threads. Where everyone can just post about it in here.
#27
The Unintelligible wrote:
Lol also, was it really necessary to sticky this thread?


Deal with it
#28
I don't even know any programming languages for one? I had to skip through a lot of posts to hurry up and get that out there, anyone is allowed in this thread, the new sig is fucking hilarious, sadly I have no idea what lesson you assume I will learn.
#29
jacklanister wrote:
I don't even know any programming languages for one? I had to skip through a lot of posts to hurry up and get that out there, anyone is allowed in this thread, the new sig is fucking hilarious, sadly I have no idea what lesson you assume I will learn.


I just made a thread about it.
The reason this community is going to shit, is because it's people are going to shit too.
If everyone's really as concerned about the way LG is going as they say they are, they'll realize this shit isn't okay.

You're more than free to delete/change your sig, but posting an entire thread dedicated to hating one user?
I get that, but if you have a problem then confront THEM about it. Don't drag the entire community down into your hateful abyss with you. That's what's killing this place.

I have nothing against you personally, I'm just using you as an example right now.
If I'm making a mistake, and misunderstood this post, I apologize.
#30
mod raivu believes the internet is serious business
#31
jacklanister wrote:
mod raivu believes the internet is serious business


That would be Unintelligiblackface.
#32
jacklanister wrote:
mod raivu believes the internet is serious business


I gave you reputation for this post, so you can afford to make a thread about how mean I am to you.
#33
Kain wrote:
How do you spell "band wagon"?
I need to spell band wagon.


Kain wrote:
2. Mentioning Unintelligiblueberries


Kain wrote:
Deal with it


Kain wrote:
That would be Unintelligiblackface.


How bleak. I expected no more or no less from you.
#34
Is anyone here going to escalate to Flaming? Yes/No
#35
The Unintelligible wrote:
How bleak. I expected no more or no less from you.


I don't get why you bolded what you did.
#36
No.

>implying he's even worth my time. lol
#37
The Unintelligible wrote:
No.

>implying he's even worth my time. lol


>meme arrowing
lol
#38
>green text
>"meme arrowing"

lel. Need I say more?
#39
The Unintelligible wrote:
>green text
>"meme arrowing"

lel. Need I say more?


>not getting the obvious joke

I'm surprised, this is the first time you've ever taken something seriously that was meant to be a joke.

That's a joke too, just so you know
#40
Kain wrote:
>not getting the obvious joke

I'm surprised, this is the first time you've ever taken something seriously that was meant to be a joke.

That's a joke too, just so you know


>addressing something blatantly wrong is a joke now
>trying to cover up for the fact that made very stupid post
>hey guise im meme arrowing lel
>even if joke was unsurprisingly another bad joke from Kain

I applaud.