Well, that was interesting.

Well let's look back on the recent event's.

A serious of "spammers", including Torian, spammed in the spamming section, and was banned for? Well, nothing, he broke no publicly declared rule, though he mentioned the name "Cyanoxide"

In response I make a spam thread in the spamming section, that did not break any rules also, then I mentioned that "Cyanoxide - A**hole is he," which is neither a question nor statement.

So let's look and see what is occurring here, oh I think I have an idea. Abuse of power.


So the idea of unbanning us is...a fix? No see now you started a problem, and now it needs to be solved.

Oh and, "Cyanoxide for moderator?"

I'm too tired to riot.

Dibs on his S. Mod powers.

Get over it.

Not really, you just wanna spark more shit . Have a verbal warning, free of charge. Drop it and grow up.

C0FFINCASE wrote:

Get over it.

It is serious business.

The internet is the center hold of the ideas of society itself.

When you have a community of people attempting to live happily, the only way to allow that to happen is a structure of standardized rules that apply to everyone and are easily to access.


@Torian

The verbal waring? For, what?

What rule have I broken, where does it say that I do not have the right to post in this section what I posted?

I have yet to read that rule.

Apparent new rules: No spamming in the spam forum. No flaming in the flame forum.

I have nothing against Torian since he unbanned me.

Chris wrote:

It is serious business.

The internet is the center hold of the ideas of society itself.

When you have a community of people attempting to live happily, the only way to allow that to happen is a structure of standardized rules that apply to everyone and are easily to access.


@Torian

The verbal waring? For, what?

What rule have I broken, where does it say that I do not have the right to post in this section what I posted?

I have yet to read that rule.

You're gonna get yourself banned for good.

Everytime I do homework I miss things.>.>
can't everyone behave while the queen is away?jesus.

GAMEchief wrote:

Apparent new rules: No spamming in the spam forum. No flaming in the flame forum.

I have nothing against Torian since he unbanned me.

Well of course, that makes total sense.

Sydd(: wrote:

Everytime I do homework I miss things.>.>
can't everyone behave while the queen is away?jesus.

And the king. Alice in Wonderland reference, anyone?

GAMEchief wrote:

Apparent new rules: No spamming in the spam forum. No flaming in the flame forum.

I have nothing against Torian since he unbanned me.

Well of course, that makes total sense.

@C0FFINCASE

For what?

What did I do to be banned?

I have yet to disrespect anything or break any rules. I am merely proceeding with a more logical and focused spam.

Chris wrote:

@Torian

The verbal waring? For, what?

What rule have I broken, where does it say that I do not have the right to post in this section what I posted?

I have yet to read that rule.

The general rule of foruming naturally. You come from outside the whole drama bubble, post shit unrelated to you and try to spark up MORE shit.

Then you post an incomplete meme as your thread title to top it all off.

Oh, right! No starting drama in the drama forum.

GAMEchief wrote:

Oh, right! No starting drama in the drama forum.

It was the whole leaving out the "accidentally" from the title that pissed me off. :mad:

Torian wrote:

The general rule of foruming naturally. You come from outside the whole drama bubble, post shit unrelated to you and try to spark up MORE shit.

Then you post an incomplete meme as your thread title to top it all off.

I was here during the entire bubble.

And I am not sparking up anything, Cyanoxide sparked it. And I am just the flame ending the situation.

And it is related to me, I was banned for being part of all of the drama following the situation.

I am merely trying to understand the actual written rule that all of the previously banned users broke, and if there is non, I want someone held responsible for the mess.

Chris wrote:

I was here during the entire bubble.

And I am not sparking up anything, Cyanoxide sparked it. And I am just the flame ending the situation.

And it is related to me, I was banned for being part of all of the drama following the situation.

I am merely trying to understand the actual written rule that all of the previously banned users broke, and if there is non, I want someone held responsible for the mess.

Actually, the flame was over before you even posted, you just happened to want to start it back up, as illogical as that is.

Torian wrote:

It was the whole leaving out the "accidentally" from the title that pissed me off. :mad:

I'm just pissed no one voted "lol b&" when I deliberately added it to the poll for people to use after my ban. :mad:

It's called STFU and smoke some weed.
It will kill you brain cells quicker.

GAMEchief wrote:

I'm just pissed no one voted "lol b&" when I deliberately added it to the poll for people to use after my ban.

You shoulda made it the first option, people tend to have lazy eyes that only see the first two.

Torian wrote:

You shoulda made it the first option, people tend to have lazy eyes that only see the first two.

You were supposed to wait until I edited the smiley before quoting me. :mad:

GAMEchief wrote:

You were supposed to wait until I edited the smiley before quoting me. :mad:

Because I totally can read minds and know when a post is about to be edited O:

Torian wrote:

Actually, the flame was over before you even posted, you just happened to want to start it back up, as illogical as that is.

You keep skipping the issue at matter;

Why where the users banned, what exact rule did they break?

And if they truly broke rules, why are they unbanned (Including myself,) and in the off chance that the all powerful LogicalGamers moderators had no reasons. Why are they not punished?

Chris wrote:

You keep skipping the issue at matter;

Why where the users banned, what exact rule did they break?

And if they truly broke rules, why are they unbanned (Including myself,) and in the off chance that the all powerful LogicalGamers moderators had no reasons. Why are they not punished?

Because you're the only one here worrying about it. All of them were unbanned because I can unban them, the "all powerful LogicalGamers moderators" werent punished because you're the only one pressing it over something so trivial.

Torian wrote:

Because you're the only one here worrying about it. All of them were unbanned because I can unban them, the "all powerful LogicalGamers moderators" werent punished because you're the only one pressing it over something so trivial.

The trivial beings nontrivial.

Might as well get it over with now, when it's easy.

I formally complain about Cyanoxide's behavior, and request he be banned.

[/starting-shit]

GAMEchief wrote:

I formally complain about Cyanoxide's behavior, and request he be banned.

[/starting-shit]

I second the motion.

Chris wrote:

The trivial beings nontrivial.

Might as well get it over with now, when it's easy.

2009-12-14 00:14 Alex Jason If someone tells Cyan to fuck off, warn them like you would any other member.
2009-12-14 00:14 Alex Jason
2009-12-14 00:14 Alex Jason Tell Cyan that if/when you see him?

There, a slap on the wrist from the big man himself. Now drop it like a big boy.

Baww, all the fun is gone now. Also, my topic was in good taste. I want it back.
At least the cricket image.

Check the stickied threads brah.

Torian wrote:

There, a slap on the wrist from the big man himself. Now drop it like a big boy.

Ok, fine I'll drop it.

Chris wrote:

Ok, fine I'll drop it.

Torian wrote:

Btw, I like the new rules.

You could post that in the rules topic, but it's closed.