Am I doing it right?

So, hacked the account of some random girl that whores herself out over skype for Gaia gold.

You guys want her phone number? She had it in her PMs.

Also, ruined her profile for her, wonder how long until she notices:

Viewing xXLethalLizzieXx's profile | Profiles v2 | Gaia Online

Take screenshots of her on Skype, post it on jailbait forums, ???, profit.

Nicely done, though.

ToyZeppelin wrote:

Take screenshots of her on Skype, post it on jailbait forums, ???, profit.

Nicely done, though.

Nah man, I'm not getting arrested for jail bait or kiddie porn or anything. That shit is fucked up. And anyway, I think she's over 18.

Flareboy323 wrote:

Nah man, I'm not getting arrested for jail bait or kiddie porn or anything. That shit is fucked up. And anyway, I think she's over 18.

You don't get arrested for jailbait, that's why it is so easy to find. If you could get it on Google, Yahoo!, or Bing, you won't get arrested.
You need Tor or a Closed Shell System to get to the deep webs in order to find/post real stuff.

Besides, isn't sharing her phone number just as bad?

ToyZeppelin wrote:

You don't get arrested for jailbait, that's why it is so easy to find. If you could get it on Google, Yahoo!, or Bing, you won't get arrested.
You need Tor or a Closed Shell System to get to the deep webs in order to find/post real stuff.

Besides, isn't sharing her phone number just as bad?

Nah. Phone number is funny, nude pictures of an underage girl aren't. And yes, you do get arrested for jailbait, it's illegal. People get caught for it all the time.

Flareboy323 wrote:

Nah. Phone number is funny, nude pictures of an underage girl aren't. And yes, you do get arrested for jailbait, it's illegal. People get caught for it all the time.

There is a difference between child pornography and jailbait.
Jailbait are non-exposing pictures of attractive women under the age of consent.

I think our definitions were different, sorry. And I guess saying it in a sarcastic and satirical way wasn't so smart either.
Anyways, I thought your images were hilarious.

JB also encompasses CP. i.e. It is bait that can land you in jail. It originated to mean CP and has since come to include non-illegal content.

@OP, don't say "whoring herself" as if female sexuality is taboo.

Do, however, share her sexual PMs for LG's amusement.

Thumbs down. Low even for LG.

I still laughed lol

Aleena wrote:

Thumbs down. Low even for LG.

Lol, you act as though LG is the Salty Spitoon. There is no "low" standard for LG. 9/10 members here are simply skids.

The Unintelligible wrote:

Lol, you act as though LG is the Salty Spitoon. There is no "low" standard for LG. 9/10 members here are simply skids.

Who said I was talking about LG?
This is more so about being a good human, Just because your a member of LG doesn't mean you need to be a piece of shit to the world.

If I recall correctly, The new direction of LG is to make it a better community for marketing virtual goods and playing games, Not going "LOL LETS RUIN AN INNOCENT WHORES LIFE"

Again, Bad dogs.

Aleena wrote:

Thumbs down. Low even for LG.

Seconded. I think the PMs may be hilarious/entertaining, but giving out her phone number or passing judgment on her is too far. I'm thinking such distribution of dox-esque material should be against the rules.

Isn't being a whore already ruining their own life?

This thread did take a turn for the worse, only because I tried to be humorous. Then a disagreement in opinions spoiled the whole thing, now everyone just sits here laughing.

Apologies.

ToyZeppelin wrote:

Isn't being a whore already ruining their own life?

I'm sorry, is it 500 AD? When did having sex start ruining your life? Or does that only apply tmen?

Charles Stover wrote:

I'm sorry, is it 500 AD? When did having sex start ruining your life? Or does that only apply tmen?

Nope, it's the 1970's, sex gives you disease.

Ethan wrote:

Nope, it's the 1970's, sex gives you disease.

Man, I wish it was at least the 90s by now, when people will realize that sex isn't immoral and that women are not inferior to men.

Lol nice bro.

Aleena wrote:

Who said I was talking about LG?
This is more so about being a good human, Just because your a member of LG doesn't mean you need to be a piece of shit to the world.

If I recall correctly, The new direction of LG is to make it a better community for marketing virtual goods and playing games, Not going "LOL LETS RUIN AN INNOCENT WHORES LIFE"

Again, Bad dogs.

Just in case you couldn't tell before, you're in that 9/10 members being skids statistic.

This post is also awfully hypocritical of you considering your past hijinks. I still say you should go back to EBU. Much more fitting place for you.

But obviously this isn't a righteous action. I haven't even been paying any attention to this thread.

Charles Stover wrote:

I'm sorry, is it 500 AD? When did having sex start ruining your life? Or does that only apply tmen?

There is a difference between being sexually active and being a whore.
Why would you think I was calling anyone who had sex a whore?

The Unintelligible wrote:

This post is also awfully hypocritical of you considering your past hijinks.

People change, bro. Just them in the present.

I still say you should go back to EBU.

No.

ToyZeppelin wrote:

There is a difference between being sexually active and being a whore.
Why would you think I was calling anyone who had sex a whore?

Except she isn't a whore, nor does being a sex worker ruin your life either.

She's like 15. Chill out with the holier-than-thou attitude just because she is more sexually active.

Charles Stover wrote:

Except she isn't a whore, nor does being a sex worker ruin your life either.

She's like 15. Chill out with the holier-than-thou attitude just because she is more sexually active.

Oh, I was speaking in general. I wasn't referring to her directly. I have no issues with her, because I have never met her. Sorry for the confusion.
I'm just going to stop posting in this thread, it has turned sour.

1.) No one on LG can take a joke. I hacked a girls account, and only thing I changed was her profile. I was nice enough not to sell her account on LG, change her password, or fuck with her friends.

2.) Did I ever actually release her phone number? Nope. So why are you guys getting so mad?

3.) How am I ruining her life? "omg her gaia profile got edited with funny pictures her life is over omg!1!!11oenone"

I kinda agree with Aleena , kinda low , it seems funny but I wouldnt hack someone over skype , i would feel to bad . I feel bad for hacking period thats why I try to find exploits but thats just me .

Flareboy323 wrote:

1.) No one on LG can take a joke. I hacked a girls account, and only thing I changed was her profile. I was nice enough not to sell her account on LG, change her password, or fuck with her friends.

You should have sold her account on LG.

2.) Did I ever actually release her phone number? Nope. So why are you guys getting so mad?

You said you were morally in favor of doing so. I'd have just removed it, so whatever. I don't think it's explicitly been said before that it's not allowed.

No, just her skype name

I don't feel bad for hacking people. I got hacked before, and I learned my lesson and it taught me a lot, so I'm just teaching other people that lesson. I had close to 5m taken from me, all earned legitimately over the course of around five years.

@Charles: I am selling the account. Only 15 LGG, check my marketplace thread.

There is something wrong when a 15 year old girl is showing herself to strange men.

-0- D i o r -0- wrote:

There is something wrong when a 15 year old girl is showing herself to strange men.

Yes, there's definitely something wrong with her, and not the strange men perving over 15 year old girls. As long as we know that women are the only ones who should be judged as inferior for sexual behavior, because a 15 year old boy on cam with a strange woman would only get high fives.

Charles Stover wrote:

Yes, there's definitely something wrong with her, and not the strange men perving over 15 year old girls. As long as we know that women are the only ones who should be judged as inferior for sexual behavior, because a 15 year old boy on cam with a strange woman would only get high fives.

It's wrong for both parties, but especially the young girl for not having the morale to not expose herself to hoards of random guys over the internet.

No one likes chicks who have intercourse with tons of guys. It's just a testament to their self-control (or lack thereof) and standards. It's not classy at all.

The Unintelligible wrote:

It's wrong for both parties, but especially the young girl for not having the morale to not expose herself to hoards of random guys over the internet.

How is that immoral?

No one likes chicks who have intercourse with tons of guys.

False. It's a societal stereotype that is treated as if it came first. Every pornstar that you've ever beat off to has had "intercourse with tons of guys," literally. If you've ever left high school, you'll find that college women have had sex with quite a few guys as well. Because sex is normal. And you, as a man, will have had sex with tons of women. Which is culturally okay. No one likes chicks who have a lot of sex, but we should idolize men who do? Nonsense. It's a detrimental cultural stereotype that has no foundation in the natural world.
The only standard that matters is safe sex.

Charles Stover wrote:

Yes, there's definitely something wrong with her, and not the strange men perving over 15 year old girls. As long as we know that women are the only ones who should be judged as inferior for sexual behavior, because a 15 year old boy on cam with a strange woman would only get high fives.

what if they boys she skyped with were 15?

Pornstars are whores. Camwhores are whores. Women who have a lot of sex are whores.

Stereotype all you want, that's how it is. And no one likes a whore.

A key that can open many locks is a wonderful key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is just a piece of shit lock.

Charles just enjoys playing devil's advocate. No way I'm having any form of serious relationship with a girl who has had intercourse with loads of different men.

Flareboy323 wrote:

Women who have a lot of sex are whores.

You should probably clarify that you mean women who have intercourse with many partners rather than lots of sex.
Also, if a man gets around as much as the girl in question, how is it not equal? that lock crap is bullshit and it's just a way to try and make a sexist opinion acceptable, which it doesn't, it just makes you look like you have the openmindedness of an obnoxiously devout christian. you may have your opinions about an acceptable lifestyle, and that's dandy but that's exactly what people who get around have as well. put yourself in other people's shoes before spitting in their face bro.

Raivu wrote:

what if they boys she skyped with were 15?

What about it? If Flareboy cammed with chicks, his friends would praise him for it.

Flareboy323 wrote:

Pornstars are whores. Camwhores are whores. Women who have a lot of sex are whores.

Stereotype all you want, that's how it is. And no one likes a whore.

A key that can open many locks is a wonderful key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is just a piece of shit lock.

Keep your sexism to yourself, thanks. Bigotry is nothing to be proud of.

The Unintelligible wrote:

Charles just enjoys playing devil's advocate.

I do, but that's not relevant.

No way I'm having any form of serious relationship with a girl who has had intercourse with loads of different men.

That's a problem with you, not her.

Charles Stover wrote:

Yes, there's definitely something wrong with her, and not the strange men perving over 15 year old girls. As long as we know that women are the only ones who should be judged as inferior for sexual behavior, because a 15 year old boy on cam with a strange woman would only get high fives.

I would think he's odd and perverse as well