The entire point of my analysis was to address the objective scientific validity of it. There are no "schools of thought" in my analysis or conclusion. It is literally a causal relationship.
Also stopped at 'school of thought,' because it seems the premise of your response is based on a misconception.
Rest of my opinion had next to nothing to do with that concept.
Originally Posted by Raivu
There's a fine line between ridiculous and sane.
You're right on it, my friend.