LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
A Springfield man is facing indecent exposure charges after police say he stood naked inside his home as a 7-year-old boy and his mother walked by.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/102109_naked_man_arrested_after_making_coffee_upda te[/url]
Should this guy face those charges? I mean seriously it's his house he can do what ever he wants in it. (anything reasonable)
AlsoPolice wouldn't release the incident report or the name of the mother who filed the complaint. FOX 5 has learned she is a respected member of the community, and just happens to be the wife of a Fairfax County Police officer
Results 1 to 25 of 25
- 10 Nov. 2009 10:08pm #1
Virginia Man Charged With Indecent Exposure After Making Coffee Naked in Kitchen Last edited by chowchig; 11 Nov. 2009 at 10:56pm.
- 10 Nov. 2009 10:17pm #2
Thread should be moved to the correct section.
But ontopic
He shouldn't be charged at all. But then again he shouldn't be walking around nude around his kid.
- 10 Nov. 2009 10:24pm #3
The mother and the child WALKED by, and therefor the man had no legal responsibility to put on his clothes. Indecent exsposure is for people who INTENTIONALY go up and say "Look, my pen0rz"
Furthermore, the police arresting him should be charged with sexual harassment, as he was not doing anything illegal and they probably arrested him nekkid.
~Fluxo
- 10 Nov. 2009 10:30pm #4 It wasn't his kid though
Originally Posted by ShadowsRandom 
Also this is debating whether a man should be charged for indecent exposure in his own home >.>
Also doesn't the mom being married to a police officer kinda make the case unfair for the guy?
- 11 Nov. 2009 03:54am #5
This pisses me off so much! America needs to stop fearing the human body so much. If someone is rubbing up against someone naked who does not want it than i could understand. But it is a human body! Noting about that deserves arresting.
// Signature
- 11 Nov. 2009 03:57am #6
There's a reason they created blinds and areas of the house you can't be seen.
He should be charged since he was naked in an area that he could be seen. If he really wanted to prance around naked, he could've just zipped down the blinds and he'd be fine.
- 11 Nov. 2009 03:58am #7
wtf were those pervs looking in his house anyway?
- 11 Nov. 2009 04:02am #8
This is the reason why.. he shouldn't be charge. Originally Posted by Rape
- 11 Nov. 2009 04:03am #9 Thats the whole problem. Why should a person be arrested for walking around HIS house in a natural state? Originally Posted by NotNeccesary // Signature
- 11 Nov. 2009 04:03am #10 only if people minded there business this world would be a way better place Originally Posted by Google
- 11 Nov. 2009 01:03pm #11 They also created free will, such as not looking into other peoples houses. Its not like he was standing at his window(as far as I know) and just posing going hey, look at me naked. The fact is he shouldn't be charged with this at all. Originally Posted by NotNeccesary
- 11 Nov. 2009 05:03pm #12
He shouldn't be charged.
It's not like he ran out the door nekkid to all the kids.
PLUS, why are they looking into his house?
- 11 Nov. 2009 05:35pm #13
WoW he could've wore Boxxers or something gosh darn.
50 Post [X]
500 Post [ ]
1,000 Post Baby [ ]
[
- 11 Nov. 2009 05:37pm #14
How can this guy get charged, if nudists can't?
They walk around naked IN PUBLIC!
This guy was in his own home, and he's getting charged for that? The mother should get charged for like Invasion of Privacy.
- 11 Nov. 2009 06:05pm #15 They were walking in public property a.k.a the sidewalk. Like, if you're walking down the street and you look into a house and you see a man kill a man. Most likely you'll run like a b*tch and call the cops. How does that relate? They lady was walking and saw the guy naked, found it as discretion, and sued him. You saw a man kill a man, called the cops, and got him in jail. Originally Posted by Thomas
- 11 Nov. 2009 10:58pm #16 Killing someone is a crime anywhere Originally Posted by NotNeccesary
But being nude isn't a crime everywhere >.>
Also I think the woman should of been charged with trespassing and invasion of privacy.I have the attention span of a 1 year old. Do not expect me to have a full out discussion with you
Originally Posted by Plobby
My MSN is shazbotgen@gmail.com, anyone else claiming to be me is scamming you.
Originally Posted by Virtue
- 11 Nov. 2009 11:01pm #17
That girl reminds me of someone I knew at one point...
Everyone was joking around, playing and having fun, we had just finished a water balloon fight. This friend i had was good friends with our neighbor, and he started messing with her and then put her in a headlock playfully and the girl got all pissed, called the cops, there was a trial, and the guy eventually got sent to jail for assault
- 11 Nov. 2009 11:10pm #18 I hate people like that >.> Originally Posted by Minora That girl reminds me of someone I knew at one point...
Everyone was joking around, playing and having fun, we had just finished a water balloon fight. This friend i had was good friends with our neighbor, and he started messing with her and then put her in a headlock playfully and the girl got all pissed, called the cops, there was a trial, and the guy eventually got sent to jail for assault
Like in Algebra II class One of my friends wrote a paper about another guy, which says some words which I wouldn't say here, but this one girl saw it and told the teacher. My friend got suspended for 2 weeks (Even the guy it was about thought it was funny)I have the attention span of a 1 year old. Do not expect me to have a full out discussion with you
Originally Posted by Plobby
My MSN is shazbotgen@gmail.com, anyone else claiming to be me is scamming you.
Originally Posted by Virtue
- 12 Nov. 2009 05:34am #19
Was the guy jacking off? If he wasn't I see no crime. :p
- 22 Dec. 2009 02:46am #20
ITs his house...i can walk around in my house naked if i want to...its not like i would be forcing anybody to look at my Long john
- 25 Dec. 2009 01:24am #21
He shouldn't be charged. You are free to be as exposed as you can inside of your own home, that is why it's your home. Tbh, the kid and the mother didn't have to look into his window.
- 29 Dec. 2009 08:28pm #22
I don't think he should be in trouble or anything.
The women should get charges for being a peeping tom.
Lol. xDDuh-Tch-Y
DeFiniTioN
A blunt (e.g. marijuana rolled into a cigar wrapper), especially one rolled with a Dutch Master Corona. It is preferred over the traditional phillie blunt as it has two layers of tobacco paper which assist in rolling a blunt with good craft.
- 29 Dec. 2009 08:39pm #23
He shouldn't i mean its his home. What the fuck were the kids looking through the window for?
- 29 Dec. 2009 08:49pm #24
Heard about this. And I totally agree. That is wrong. You are allowed to be nude in your own home. Christ sake your home is your private sanctuary. No one should have the right to look in.
- 29 Dec. 2009 10:11pm #25
Ohh yeah wow that shit pisses me off greatly. The idea of if someone looks inside your home while you're naked and they decide to call the cops.. you can get charged with indecent exposure.. It's your freaking home people shouldn't be lookng in your windows right? xD
