This would motivate more users to refer other members, and it would reward us more.
Results 1 to 38 of 38
- 29 Jan. 2010 12:48am #1
- 29 Jan. 2010 01:35am #2
could be good. but i'm sure it would backfire (i.e. people increase prices on things they sell) so it would be as if nothing had happened.
- 29 Jan. 2010 01:55am #3
It could be good, but there would always be that one member that refers like 200 people and gets LGG way too easily.
- 29 Jan. 2010 01:57am #4
- 29 Jan. 2010 02:08am #5
True, true. This might attract abuse to the system though.
- 29 Jan. 2010 02:35am #6
- 29 Jan. 2010 02:35am #7i dont like the idea. its like stealing lgg :p[/CENTER]
- 29 Jan. 2010 02:49am #8
Maybe ramp it up to 5%. 1% is so damn low.
- 29 Jan. 2010 03:22am #9
I like the idea. I'm going to trial it out.
- 29 Jan. 2010 03:26am #10
Administrator Best Avatar Award
- Age
- 32
- Join Date
- Nov. 2009
- Location
- Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Posts
- 6,251
- Reputation
- 790
- LCash
- 100.00
you already get 10k LG per referral...
- 29 Jan. 2010 03:31am #11
And LG gets one more member.
I personally love the idea. It gives people incentive to invite people who are honest LGers, rather than leechers. This would not make a sudden jump in fake referrals, as it would barely increase LG. It would be more efficient to post on your own account, rather than on somebody else's.50 ◉ 100 ◉ 250 ◉ 500 ◉ 1,000
Bronze ◉ Silver ◉ Gold
Respected ◉ Middle-Man ◉ VIP
[Guide] Balloons Hack
[Guide] Free GaiaCash
[Guide] Create an eMail From Any Website
[Guide] GaiaGold From zOMG!
[Guide] zOMG! EasyKiller
[Guide] Change Gold Earned From Towns
[Guide] WPE Gaia Vortex
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
- 29 Jan. 2010 03:34am #12
Eh, Arti, I respect that you like the idea, but... this would be easily abused, x account invites y account, x account sends y account all it's gold, x account just made 1% more than they had before. Multiply that by say my gold amount, that adds up to a shit load after several transfers...
- 29 Jan. 2010 09:49am #13
- 29 Jan. 2010 09:32pm #14
I like this idea...
Definitely dont add gold from trades, only posts and topics.LG's resident grammar nazi.
Need warez? I can probably find it for you. Throw me a PM.
For all of my sales, if you refer a buyer to me and they make a purchase, you can recieve 5%
- 29 Jan. 2010 09:39pm #15....its like penalizing kids for getting reffered[/CENTER]
- 29 Jan. 2010 09:49pm #1650 ◉ 100 ◉ 250 ◉ 500 ◉ 1,000
Bronze ◉ Silver ◉ Gold
Respected ◉ Middle-Man ◉ VIP
[Guide] Balloons Hack
[Guide] Free GaiaCash
[Guide] Create an eMail From Any Website
[Guide] GaiaGold From zOMG!
[Guide] zOMG! EasyKiller
[Guide] Change Gold Earned From Towns
[Guide] WPE Gaia Vortex
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
- 29 Jan. 2010 11:10pm #17
- 30 Jan. 2010 01:07am #18
- 30 Jan. 2010 01:17am #19
- 30 Jan. 2010 02:00am #20
That's what I thought. Why not 5% or 10%?
- 30 Jan. 2010 02:07am #21
- 30 Jan. 2010 02:12am #22
Then raise it to something like half...
- 30 Jan. 2010 02:31am #23
- 30 Jan. 2010 02:55am #24
It'd be incentive to refer more than one person.
- 30 Jan. 2010 04:39am #25
Learn2math. 25k. + multiple referalls
- 30 Jan. 2010 06:41am #26
Why not just keep stuff the way it is right now...Were doing good so far no need to Suddenly change anything...LG is great with keeping up with people who spam...I mean Rapes still not gone but who cares...The sites doing fine we don't need this 1% crap its to low
- 31 Jan. 2010 03:19am #27
10k + 1% is fine.
The fact that you're getting 10k per referral is already fucking amazing as it takes a shit load of posts to do. The 1% just adds on to the amount of LGG you'll make, so don't bitch and say 5% or 10%, etc.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
- 31 Jan. 2010 06:02am #28
If it's too low (1%), there is no incentive in doing it, thus there's no point of offering 1% in the first place.
- 31 Jan. 2010 03:33pm #29
Maybe lower the actual refering bonus to 5k, then raise the posting bonus to 10%?
- 31 Jan. 2010 05:11pm #30
How about a better suggestion. Keep it the way it is, due to well lets think about this... did you even read my post above? You would have ... what, 1% chance of making that 5k in posting to make up for it? Yeah, how about you all quit trying to be greedy and keep it the way it is? Please tell me what's wrong with the current system, please.
- 31 Jan. 2010 05:15pm #31
Nothing is. He's just trying to find a way for there to be more incentive to want to refer people.
- 31 Jan. 2010 06:08pm #32
Does the current system give you LGG upon registration? That's exploitable, but IDK if that's the case.
But, the upside to this case is, if I refer someone who gets 50 posts, I get 10k. If you refer someone who gets 500 posts, you get 10k, even though your referal was 10 times as valuable. Not only does it improve incentive, but it improves incentive for members who are actually worth getting (not spammers or people who will quit after however many posts it takes to get the LGG bonus).
- 31 Jan. 2010 08:31pm #33
- 01 Feb. 2010 10:01pm #34
I like the idea, kind of similar to prizerebel tactic
BUT maybe it should be one or the other. Either,
get lg by getting people to sign up or getting 0 lgg
and once they have some posts you gain from it.
- 02 Feb. 2010 01:18am #35
But it's messed up.
If you get 10k when they register, then you get 10k total.
However if you get 1% of their earnings, then you need to wait for them to get 10,000 posts to make 100LGG per post, 10,000x100 = 1 mil LGG, and you would get 1% or 10k. So I suggest either 10k at registration or 10% of their earnings, which would mean they need to get 1000 posts for you to get 10k.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
- 02 Feb. 2010 01:28am #36
- 02 Feb. 2010 03:05am #37
- 03 Feb. 2010 09:14am #38
i think any referrals you the user can get should be rewarded
you get us a member you should be rewarded
its word to mouth advertising and thats the best advertisement out there