ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?/21
1.2k views · started by Butts ·
Bro don't worry that was only given because bunnyz got on his account.
nvm on my comment
Why "nvm" your comment? That's exactly why it was given.
Like I said in the thread I posted about it, bunnyz got into my account, so disregard any infractions you've received from me over the last few days.
Like I said in the thread I posted about it, bunnyz got into my account, so disregard any infractions you've received from me over the last few days.
Yeah, there were like three or four infractions given out by bunnyz. They've all been reversed. 
Oh well nvm then lol yes u did get it from the stupid bunnyz why can't u ban him?
GAMEchief wrote:Yeah, there were like three or four infractions given out by bunnyz. They've all been reversed.
Nah there were at least like 5, he kept deleting threads. You sure it was only 3?
mintzero wrote:Oh well nvm then lol yes u did get it from the stupid bunnyz why can't u ban him?
I think he and GAME worked out some kind of deal or something, not exactly sure.
Flareboy323 wrote:Nah there were at least like 5, he kept deleting threads. You sure it was only 3?
I think he and GAME worked out some kind of deal or something, not exactly sure.
Well what the hell if it was my forum and he hurt it he would be ip banned thats stupid
Lol all the fail attempts from minizero trying to get me in trouble
Sooooooooo why are you guys trying t
rk shit out with some skid
rk shit out with some skidC0FFINCASE wrote:We're not, he doesn't have any say in the matter. The staff is voting on what the appropriate punishment is.
Can we have a roast. I'm hungry and a roast sounds nice. We could drizzle it in gravy, and maybe surround it with some potatoes and carrots.
If you weren't scared of losing one of your 5 active members he'd be banned by now and new security requirements and a mandatory password change of staff would already have been in effect.
bmlkiddo wrote:If you weren't scared of losing one of your 5 active members he'd be banned by now and new security requirements and a mandatory password change of staff would already have been in effect.
1. We aren't at all reluctant to ban him. We're pondering whether that is the necessary or otherwise appropriate course of action right now.
2. It was mostly Flare's fault, not his. He did what was in human nature to do. It was just curiosity. Not that it was okay--still completely ban worthy--but considering our current economy and member base, it might not be that serious. He is at the very least still receiving an infraction and/or a temporary ban.
3. Has nothing at all to do with security. And he got into a moderator account, not admin. Password changes definitely not warranted.
The Unintelligible wrote:1. We aren't at all reluctant to ban him. We're pondering whether that is the necessary or otherwise appropriate course of action right now.
2. It was mostly Flare's fault, not his. He did what was in human nature to do. It was just curiosity. Not that it was okay--still completely ban worthy--but considering our current economy and member base, it might not be that serious. He is at the very least still receiving an infraction and/or a temporary ban.
3. Has nothing at all to do with security. And he got into a moderator account, not admin. Password changes definitely not warranted.
1. While I understand where you are coming from, not having the self control to stop yourself from doing this, on my forum, wold warrent for immediate action, regardless of the economy or user base. It gives off a sign that users can get away with what they please, in this case being something thought of as a big deal, logging into the account of a moderator. But this is only my own opinion.
2. Regardless of who's fault it is. I agree, it's probably Flare's fault, but regardless, read the above response. It gives the impression that users can abuse such exploits without so much as a slap on the wrist.
3. It has to do with Flare's obvious security issue. I'm not saying everyone requires a password change, but I believe the security I am talking about is password strength. Just give everyone a reminder to make sure their passwords aren't easially guess, and the sort. And the same with security questions. It's not to harp on the staf,, just to give them an eye on what happened and to be weary. It has to do with the security of accounts. Not database security, but it's obvious it had something to do with Flare. I garentee whats his name didn't do some elite hacker shit. It was probably just a bit of stalking on his part to guess personal info, and flare's negligence. Nonetheless, Bunny went out of his way to commit this act. You must admit this. It took effort and thought.
Also, Off topic, I enjoy discussions with you.
bmlkiddo wrote:1. While I understand where you are coming from, not having the self control to stop yourself from doing this, on my forum, wold warrent for immediate action, regardless of the economy or user base. It gives off a sign that users can get away with what they please, in this case being something thought of as a big deal, logging into the account of a moderator. But this is only my own opinion.
That's entirely true. Which is why I said it's still wholly ban worthy. We are still contemplating whether banning him or not. But permanently banning him would be no fun.
bmlkiddo wrote:2. Regardless of who's fault it is. I agree, it's probably Flare's fault, but regardless, read the above response. It gives the impression that users can abuse such exploits without so much as a slap on the wrist.
If a user full-fledged exploited this forum they would be banned for it. No questions asked. Incidentally, that's what "bunnyz" was banned for in the first place. I do agree with the notion that some users would think they could get away with anything, but that's just not the way it is. If bunnyz were to be perma banned it would be the exception, not the rule. See the millions of other users I've banned.
Also, Aleena has "exploited" LG a lot in its golden days. Guess what? Still not banned even though I tried to do so. GAMEchief is the admin of LG, exploited LG a bit when it was still in its pinnacle. Not banned.
bmlkiddo wrote:3. It has to do with Flare's obvious security issue. I'm not saying everyone requires a password change, but I believe the security I am talking about is password strength. Just give everyone a reminder to make sure their passwords aren't easially guess, and the sort. And the same with security questions. It's not to harp on the staf,, just to give them an eye on what happened and to be weary. It has to do with the security of accounts. Not database security, but it's obvious it had something to do with Flare. I garentee whats his name didn't do some elite hacker shit. It was probably just a bit of stalking on his part to guess personal info, and flare's negligence. Nonetheless, Bunny went out of his way to commit this act. You must admit this. It took effort and thought.
You have some fair points, some of which I completely agree with, but I don't think you understand how this happened. Flareboy323 sold a text file to cclown that contained his password. It isn't anything related to security, it was just 100% tomfoolery on Flare's end. Which is why it's kind of hard to blame bunnyz for this considering it was just a monumental fail by Flare.
He's getting punished, but to what extent has yet to be decided. In theory even if he were to be banned, he would just make new accounts like he did before and keep coming back. Which would make it more of a pain to keep banning him.
It can still be done. I just don't know if that's the best gameplan right now.
bmlkiddo wrote:Also, Off topic, I enjoy discussions with you.
Likewise.
The Unintelligible wrote:That's entirely true. Which is why I said it's still wholly ban worthy. We are still contemplating whether banning him or not. But permanently banning him would be no fun.
If a user full-fledged exploited this forum they would be banned for it. Incidentally, that's what "bunnyz" was banned for in the first place. I do agree with the notion that users would think they could get away with anything, but that's just not the way it is. If bunnyz weren't to be perma banned it would be the exception, not the rule. See the millions of other users I've banned.
You have some fair points, some of which I completely agree with, but I don't think you're understanding how this happened. Flareboy323 sold a text file to cclown that contained his password. It isn't anything related to security, it was just 100% tomfoolery on Flare's end. Which is why it's particularly hard to blame bunnyz for this considering it was just a monumental fail by Flare.
He's getting punished, but to what extent has yet to be decided. In theory even if he were to be banned, he would just make new accounts like he did before and keep coming back. Which would make it more of a pain to keep banning him.
It can still be done. I just don't know if that's the best course of action right now.
Likewise.
1. At least ban the account which took the LGG and bought things with. That's how I see it. This combines with 2. as well. At least banning the account in question would be enough. Even if he came back, oh well. People do that. But you should at least rid of damages in question, even if they are small, it still looks as if users can take advantage of a mistake, and cause harm with it.
3. Indeed, so do you. Flareboy may have made this mistake, but regardless, the user could have have self control to warn Flare about it. But even if he didn't, sure he tried the password. I admit, wh
uldn't at least try it? It takes an active thought to cause harm, such as stealing the LGG on Flare's account. Flare should take it as a lesson, we all make mistakes. But Bunneyz should, honestly, have this current account perm banned. If he so chooses to come back, that's on him, you can't really stop someone persistent. But you do have to lie down controls. The account in question, bunneyz, should honestly be banned, mainly because it's the account that has benefited from the issue. One could bring up the argument "We can just reverse the transactions and gain."
But why would you create more overhead for your staff, that was caused by the malicious intent of a uses? Especially when they had the audacity to post about it, bragging of their chao items afterwards?
bmlkiddo wrote:1. At least ban the account which took the LGG and bought things with. That's how I see it. This combines with 2. as well. At least banning the account in question would be enough. Even if he came back, oh well. People do that. But you should at least rid of damages in question, even if they are small, it still looks as if users can take advantage of a mistake, and cause harm with it.
3. Indeed, so do you. Flareboy may have made this mistake, but regardless, the user could have have self control to warn Flare about it. But even if he didn't, sure he tried the password. I admit, wh
One could bring up the argument "We can just reverse the transactions and gain."
But why would you create more overhead for your staff, that was caused by the malicious intent of a uses? Especially when they had the audacity to post about it, bragging of their chao items afterwards?
All im reding is ban him ban him ban him ban him, why do you want me banned so bad, thats for mods to decide on, you arguing over something that doesn't even concern you.
Lol wut his account got deleted I guess
oh hey it's this old thread. A gem from the remnants of the "bunnyz" era.
Sadly dude is still on this forum to this very day under a different username. At least he's less retarded (not really).
Sadly dude is still on this forum to this very day under a different username. At least he's less retarded (not really).
I was making reputation for myself then I sort of started scamming after my customers started unvouching getting banned from the shit i sold them, I got to say i did made $
How does that imply to my shit
imply