Read-only archive

A preserved archive of the Logical Gamers community forums, 2009-2025. The original threads and posts, served read-only. Registration, posting and private messages are gone for good.

Reguarding the Signature of Lord Google

1.1k views · started by Souleater ·
#1
Reguarding the Signature of Lord Google
Was there any member who was actually offended by it and felt that it should be removed?
#2
Not offended what so ever, i kinda loved the face that 4 overly pierced vagina entered my screen it was life changing:) Im not using sarcasm put it back in your sigg
#3
Whaddaya mean?]
I dont see whats wrong with it
:/
#4
I've added a poll. Fill it out.
#5
Vote no if you have a soul.
#6
As stated on the other thread, I didnt put it up so it can turn into a problem. Just wanted to express the awesome artwork images and etc.

But vote above.
I am sorry if it offended you so don't feel bad to vote yes.
I don't mind removing it.
#7
Martin wrote:
Vote no if you have a soul.


I have been here for 4 years. I do get hungry from time to time. So Souls are few and far between.
#8
Put it back up the art was kick ass.
#9
Lord Google sounds sexy :P

Thanks for making the thread soul. I'm on mobile ATM.
#11
Google wrote:
Lord Google sounds sexy :P

Thanks for making the thread soul. I'm on mobile ATM.


I think I just found a new UN for you. :D
Once you are able, re-add your signature. and give Chris the link. He wants to test something.
#13
Souleater wrote:
I have been here for 4 years. I do get hungry from time to time. So Souls are few and far between.


But you don't count good sir.
#14
Martin wrote:
But you don't count good sir.


I feel that I must disagree my comrad.
#15
iShellz wrote:
*this is what he meant by a problems*

If it's fine enough to go on twitter, it's fine enough to go on here.
#16
Lady Gaga wrote:
If it's fine enough to go on twitter, it's fine enough to go on here.


Twitter isn't the best defense in the world.
#17
Lady Gaga wrote:
If it's fine enough to go on twitter, it's fine enough to go on here.


Well really can't argue with that can we? TWITTERRERRRRRRR
#18
Souleater wrote:
I feel that I must disagree my comrad.


I must say, you're disagreement means nothing my crony.
#19
#20
Souleater wrote:


I lol' d
#21
Souleater wrote:
Twitter isn't the best defense in the world.


But Google's reason for showing us stapled vagina and whip cream titties is. Mmk
#22
Lady Gaga wrote:
But Google's reason for showing us stapled vagina and whip cream titties is. Mmk


No one cares. Do what ever you want.
#23
Lady Gaga wrote:
I won't be offended with the fact I saw va-jay-jay If you don't remove this from my sig <3
Twitpics - 218154065 - The Fame Gallery - Lady Gaga Pictures


I find this picture quite fine. Ever notice that on TV shows the ass is the only part of the body they don't blur out/show at all? The only thing I'm concerned about is how many followers will you get with the whole "hey look he has a dirty picture, so can I!!"
I have yet to come across any form of a vagina with out the ass piercings in GOOGLE's sig; but I have come across LG ToS breaking images in other user's sigs that are just like it. Gaga's ass is showing is nothing compared to some of the shit I've seen in sigs.

Frankly, I say don't. If the pictures break the ToS, don't. Just... no, don't.
#24
This all could have been avoided if Minora did not make that stupid thread.
#25
Tatsuo wrote:
This all could have been avoided if Minora did not make that stupid thread.


yup it's all my fault. :roll:
#26
I like to refresh the page sometimes when i get bored to see what comes up on his sig :O
#30
Lol.
It wasn't minoria fault. She/he was just pointing some of the stuff out.

@gaga: I don't see why you can't put that in your sigy? She is wearing underwear.