All my accounts are banned now ._.
Sigh, gaia is starting to just piss me off.
Sigh, gaia is starting to just piss me off.
i was banned?
5.5k views · started by ccgamer · · page 2 of 2
ITT people mad about Gaia banning them for breaking the rules.
The Unintelligible wrote:That's pretty much the point. People are getting upset about their bans when they were (more or less) warranted. Therefore no one's complaints are legit here.
Yup, kind of dumb to make a thread to complain about bannings when they are obviously at fault. You get banned for breaking the rules, you move on not make a thread where everyone complains about how much they get banned. Especially when many of these people have been posting around on these forums how they've been doing these things that are against the ToS, yet seem surprised when they are banned.
PrincessFluttershy wrote:This is why you don't buy phished accounts :/
That's why you don't even use phished accounts. If someone is selling a phished account, they are smart enough to know that if they used it they will get banned fairly quick. Phishing accounts is probably the most basic, insecure, quickest ban method possible of acquiring accounts.
Seriously, what do you expect to happen when someone steals an account that someone is actively using?
The Unintelligible wrote:That's pretty much the point. People are getting upset about their bans when they were (more or less) warranted. Therefore no one's complaints are legit here.
Surprise isn't a requirement of anger.
GAMEchief wrote:Surprise isn't a requirement of anger.
"upset" doesn't necessarily equate to anger. Upset is more of a disconcerted emotion. Whether it's being surprised or upset, that doesn't matter because people in this thread should be none of these things. They shouldn't be surprised, because as stated, it isn't very surprising when you look at the circumstances.
They shouldn't be upset because they should have seen this coming. Hence they shouldn't be surprised.
Nice straw man attempt, though.
Tree wrote:That's why you don't even use phished accounts. If someone is selling a phished account, they are smart enough to know that if they used it they will get banned fairly quick. Phishing accounts is probably the most basic, insecure, quickest ban method possible of acquiring accounts.
Seriously, what do you expect to happen when someone steals an account that someone is actively using?
Not like I ever phish accounts. It's a waste of time, and I'm well aware of all the intricacies on how gaia online bans.
I'm fairly adept at avoiding it if I cared to try, and I'm well aware of things that were done, were possible and a nice stockpile of accounts that aren't banned which I can sell. No need to talk to me as if I'm some haphazard n00b.
The Unintelligible wrote:They shouldn't be upset because they should have seen this coming. Hence they shouldn't be surprised.
Yeah, hence they shouldn't be surprised. We established that. It only took you one sentence to forget you were trying to justify why they shouldn't be upset. And anger or not, surprise isn't a prerequisite to feeling upset either.
Nice straw man attempt, though.
I don't think you know what this is.
1) Ctrl-F mad
2) try again
In a nutshell: Your post only proved that you didn't understand Tree's original post (hence he understood and agreed with me when you made a wrongful, snide remark). But yeah. Keep feigning righteousness, bro.
1. "Stating the obvious much?" If he were stating the obvious people wouldn't be surprised/complaining/upset in this thread.
2. I proceeded to explain to you what he meant by his post, retort "Surprise isn't a requirement of anger."
3. Irrelevant, tangential point that doesn't really affect the fact that you misunderstood Tree. Hence straw man.
1. "Stating the obvious much?" If he were stating the obvious people wouldn't be surprised/complaining/upset in this thread.
2. I proceeded to explain to you what he meant by his post, retort "Surprise isn't a requirement of anger."
3. Irrelevant, tangential point that doesn't really affect the fact that you misunderstood Tree. Hence straw man.
Gaiaonline does ban people with no reason (which is probably a mistake) has happened to me and they have done nothing about it.
The Unintelligible wrote:1. "Stating the obvious much?" If he were stating the obvious people wouldn't be surprised/complaining/upset in this thread.
Except that conclusion is false. Which was my entire point.
2. I proceeded to explain to you what he meant by his post, retort "Surprise isn't a requirement of anger."
3. Irrelevant, tangential point that doesn't really affect the fact that you misunderstood Tree. Hence straw man.
lolno
GAMEchief wrote:Except that conclusion is false. Which was my entire point.
But your entire point was non-sequitur/false. See user making thread about them being banned which should not be news to them. Which was in turn Tree's entire point. Consequently, more people decided to point out how they were banned, which also shouldn't be of surprise to them.
Tree's pointing out that they're doing this when they really have no reason to. Ergo pointless thread.
"Surprise isn't a requirement of anger" has little to nothing to do with that matter. As said, regardless of anger/surprise/etc., this thread was evoked due to the element of users somehow complaining/being astonished about their ban.
I don't know how much more clear I can make this, but it should be obvious where you were wrong in saying "Stating the obvious much?" which is completely missing the point of his post.
I don't get why you two are arguing tbh.
GAMEchief wrote:Honestly, they are probably hair-trigger banning members since they know the slots bots exist. It's probably not entirely safe to use at all, since they surely combine constant slot activity with any other even remotely suspicious activity -- like matching your IP to trades on other accounts.
Y'all should keep in mind that Gaia knows these programs exist and probably target them manually on top of automatic detectors.
Tbh I don't think they'd look 'manually' to try to ban you. They probably just have a range of flags that are used to determine if someone is botting. From the sounds of things, it sounds like your interval is fixed? Randomise it, lel, and try to think of anything else they could use to determine whether or not someone is botting.
The Unintelligible wrote:But your entire point was non-sequitur/false. See user making thread about them being banned which should not be news to them. Which was in turn Tree's entire point. Consequently, more people decided to point out how they were banned, which also shouldn't be of surprise to them.
Something "not being news to you" does not mean you cannot be upset about it. If my brother dies in the War in Iraq, I won't be surprised, but I will be upset. What aren't you getting?
Tree's pointing out that they're doing this when they really have no reason to. Ergo pointless thread.
Venting. People talk to each other. Even about pointless things.
The Unintelligible wrote:One post that refutes your entire stance in this meaningless argument:
If you don't understand how this disputes you, then I really don't have much else to add.
This is literally you quoting someone saying they are angry, not surprised.
GAMEchief wrote:Something "not being news to you" does not mean you cannot be upset about it. If my brother dies in the War in Iraq, I won't be surprised, but I will be upset. What aren't you getting?
Venting. People talk to each other. Even about pointless things.
This is literally you quoting someone saying they are angry, not surprised.
Tree wrote:ITT people mad about Gaia banning them for breaking the rules.
like I said, not going to add much more. Going to let you slowly but surely piece this together and realize why and where you were wrong.
Except for the part where I'm anger =/= surprise, nor is being upset mutually inclusive with surprise. Still. So there's that.
lol
whoosh
whoosh
I got banned too. Offsite trading they said *Rolls eyes* 1.5mill in pure and 4.7mill in items. I put in a ticket. Why? because gaia you fucked up and I never offsite tradded you derpheads. =w=