Can anyone crack hashes?

ff5d4d619efac6283495241ae4e5c04b

Anyone?

Where did you get this from? I can help if you would like.

your code says ''hello'' -w-

cclown23 wrote:

your code says ''hello'' -w-

Wrong. "Hello" (minus the quotes of course), translates to this via MD5 - 5d41402abc4b2a76b9719d911017c592.

@OP, look around the net. There are several MD5 hash crackers around. I Google'd the hash and found no search results so looks like it isn't located in any common MD5 hash databases. Looks like you'll have to crack it manually.

And for the heck of it, I'll create an MD5 hash cracker and post it in the programming section when I have the spare time.

Good luck.

Edit: LOL @ cclown23. If that was a pun directed towards Personoid, I lol'd.

I have tried all the known databases for this hash and its not found, I dont know how to utilise a rainbow table.
its for someone i know has to do with neopets.

brute forcing will work better for gaia accounts

edit: b73bf7d3ba1a517644661bc4bcd85f9a xDDDDDD

cclown23 wrote:

brute forcing will work better for gaia accounts

edit: b73bf7d3ba1a517644661bc4bcd85f9a xDDDDDD

Uh, brute forcing is unbelievably impractical. You've got no almost no chance.
Also MD5 Question... - Clickteam, stop acting like my reasoning was invalid

It also could be salted, which would make it next to impossible.

Mang wrote:

I love you, Newt<3

Reporting you for spamming.

@Artificial, sounds delicious. Can u salt me up a few hashes plz.

edit: wait, i can do ettt.

<?php $hash = md5("hash"); $salt = "salt"; echo(md5($hash + $salt)); ?>

DID I DO GOOD?!?!

Protozoid wrote:

Reporting you for spamming.

@Artificial, sounds delicious. Can u salt me up a few hashes plz.

edit: wait, i can do ettt.

<?php $hash = md5("hash"); $salt = "salt"; echo(md5($hash + $salt)); ?>

DID I DO GOOD?!?!

Wat? Not sure what you're going at.

<?php $encryption = md5(md5(string_to_encrypt) + salt)); ?>

Chad wrote:

Wat? Not sure what you're going at.

<?php $encryption = md5(md5(string_to_encrypt) + salt)); ?>

Guess my code wasn't as short as can be.

) :

sucks sucking at PHP.

Mang wrote:

I love you, Newt<3

Please don't use that name.

Chad wrote:

Wat? Not sure what you're going at.

<?php $encryption = md5(md5(string_to_encrypt) + salt)); ?>

Nice fail. . not +

Come to look at, I think my code is more salty than his.
So I still feel accomplished.

Edit: Ouch, just ran your code through my EasyPHP server. Invalid.

Parse error: syntax error, [b]unexpected ')'[/b], expecting ',' or ';'

I even made a couple of minor adjustments,

<?php echo md5(md5("hash") + "salt")); 

Even when demonstrating that there's a simpler approach to something, it's always good to practice precision.

Better luck next time, Chad.

Protozoid wrote:

Come to look at, I think my code is more salty than his.
So I still feel accomplished.

Edit: Ouch, just ran your code through my EasyPHP server. Invalid.

Parse error: syntax error, [b]unexpected ')'[/b], expecting ',' or ';'

I even made a couple of minor adjustments,

<?php echo md5(md5("hash") + "salt")); 

Even when demonstrating that there's a simpler approach to something, it's always good to practice precision.

Better luck next time, Chad.

Since when does + work in PHP?
Edit: Just noticed chad's version is also missing a method to output the hash lol

Depends, what version do you use primarily? + is generally the concatenation operator in all of the versions of PHP I've worked with.

Edit: Lol @ Mang getting banned. Thank god.
Edit again: False alarm. People can hope, people can hope..

Protozoid wrote:

<?php echo md5(md5("hash") + "salt")); 

Even when demonstrating that there's a simpler approach to something, it's always good to practice precision.

Better luck next time, Chad.

Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ')', expecting ',' or ';'

+ won't concatenate either:

<?php echo md5(md5("hash") . "salt");

Better like next time!

Artificial wrote:

Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ')', expecting ',' or ';'

+ won't concatenate either:

<?php echo md5(md5("hash") . "salt");

Better like next time!

I'm not used to PHP as I've said earlier.

Protozoid wrote:

Guess my code wasn't as short as can be.

) :

sucks sucking at PHP

Personoid and anyone that knows me knows this. It was a Delphi + Pascal habit that carried out to PHP.
I also thought the hash echo outputted was the outputted form of both the respective elements concatenated. I was 100% + was the proper concatenation operator in PHP. I guess it's "better luck next time" for the both of Chad and I then.

That still doesn't entitle you to come into this thread stealing my line in means to insult me. Chad actually doesn't annoy me as much as he used to. I guess I've misjudged him somewhat.

If you plan on replying, please don't reply with some smiley. My patience for weeaboos is growing slim today.

Protozoid wrote:

I'm not used to PHP as I've said earlier. Personoid and anyone that knows me knows this. It was a Delphi + Pascal habit that carried out to PHP.
I also thought the hash echo outputted was the outputted form of both the respective elements concatenated. I was 100% + was the operator in PHP. I guess it's "better luck next time" for the both of Chad and I then.

That still doesn't entitle you to come into this thread stealing my line in means to insult me. Chad actually doesn't annoy me as much as he used to. I guess I've misjudged him somewhat.

If you plan on replying, please don't reply with some smiley. My patience for weeaboos is growing slim today.

You made the exact mistake you called Chad out on. Your patience for weeaboos may be waning, but so is mine for arrogance.

Artificial wrote:

You made the exact mistake you called Chad out on. Your patience for weeaboos may be waning, but so is mine for arrogance.

Predictable. Don't be an assuming faggot, please. What I was doing was no form of arrogance whatsoever. My first reply to Chad's simplified way of performing a salt/hash procedure was not only a commendation to him, but an insult to me.

Edit: Actually, I think I speak for the both of us when I say this - I think we both were being half-serious all in all. But I think Chad actually knows enough PHP to do this correctly. I don't. I spent too much time on desktop application programming and now it's coming back to bite me on the butt.

Oh and, the mistake I called him out on was the excess use of parenthesis, not the use of an invalid concatenation operator.

I don't figure out how these code snippets would solve that task. All I can find is this huge md5 reverse database with more than 306,000,000,000 cracked strings, and it is being daily updated using powerful machines.

~Shieru No Tamashi~ wrote:

I don't figure out how these code snippets would solve that task. All I can find is this huge md5 reverse database with more than 306,000,000,000 cracked strings, and it is being daily updated using powerful machines.

Oh, they won't help. The thread got somewhat derailed by me. Apologies, everyone.

Protozoid wrote:

Oh, they won't help. The thread got somewhat derailed by me. Apologies, everyone.

And by the way, since we're already derailing, I think the correct MD5/password/salt combinations are provided by JavaScripts. If you dig around a website's JS resources you can find what you're looking for.

~Shieru No Tamashi~ wrote:

And by the way, since we're already derailing, I think the correct MD5/password/salt combinations are provided by JavaScripts. If you dig around a website's JS resources you can find what you're looking for.

Um, there are no "correct" salt combinations. Just saying.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_(cryptography)

Protozoid wrote:

Um, there are no "correct" salt combinations. Just saying.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_(cryptography)

By salt, I mean strings like the 'chap' string used in gaia's marketplace, or even the 'nonce' string. Those strings are not completely randomly generated.

And by correct combination, I mean the right way to get the final hash:

Example1:

final hash = MD5(MD5(password) & salt)

Example2:

final hash = MD5(MD5(password) & MD5(salt))

If you meant that, everyone in this thread was using the proper combination this entire time.

Also, Example2 is invalid I believe. #1 looks fine.

Edit: Sorry to break it to you, but nonce isn't a salt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_nonce

Found that while researching on cryptography. But I don't blame you for having the idea.

Salt is closely related to the concept of nonce.

Protozoid wrote:

If you meant that, everyone in this thread was using the proper combination this entire time.

Also, Example2 is invalid I believe. #1 looks fine.

Edit: Sorry to break it to you, but nonce isn't a salt.
Cryptographic nonce - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Found that while researching on cryptography. But I don't blame you for having the idea.

Vocabulary is betraying both of us, my friend.

~Shieru No Tamashi~ wrote:

Vocabulary is betraying both of us, my friend.

Oh, so you meant trd it differently. Alright. I follow.
But I see no where where it betrayed me.

I dunno, feel free to point it out. Much appreciated, my good man.

Protozoid wrote:

Oh, so you meant trd it differently. Alright. I follow.
But I see no where where it betrayed me.

I dunno, feel free to point it out.

That could be the case. I do apologize as well.

So.. since everyone's done as much as they can to help the OP, I think this thread should be locked.
But that may just be me. At least it'll keep spammers like Mang away.

Protozoid wrote:

So.. since everyone's done as much as they can to help the OP, I think this thread should be locked.
But that may just be me. At least it'll keep spammers like Mang away.

I'll second this.
Also, @Artificial, Chad tried to correct Proto in the first place and made several errors (not 1) including failing to specify a method for printing the output of the md5'd string, the wrong concatenation operator and an additional parenthesis. I don't think it's fair for you to defend Chad (especially in this situation where /he/ was the one demonstrating arrogance).

no one figured it out?

---------- Post added at 04:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 AM ----------

also, its not salted, its just regular md5, Idk why, but i cant find it anywhere.

i looked a bit into this and the hash is manually scrambled, ive been needing some practice with my algorithm so ive been attempting to crack this for a few days. what ive worked out is that its a 7 digit phone number. because i believe there are 7 digits and they are all numbers. ive tried all repeating numbers such as 1111111-9999999 and common numerical sequences such as 1231231 and 123456789 ive tried a lot more but they are a few examples iv been trying to figure out the first number for days and ive finally got it. its 7. good luck with the rest of this hash, it was manually scrambled so dont bother looking in hash crackers online.

To be honest, I wrote that line off of the top of my head. Gaia doesn't echo/print their hash to you (only in gsi as far as I know), they just make it and store it in a cookie. I forgot the period in PHP acts as the +, and as for the misplaced parenthesis, everyone makes simple mistakes. There's no need to start an argument off of it, Personoid.
And I wasn't trying to be arrogant. I just saw that he had a longer line of code that could have been shortened. Some times it gets a little confusing switch from language to language.

Personoid didn't start the argument over this, Artificial did.
Just sayin'

Protozoid wrote:

Personoid didn't start the argument over this, Artificial did.
Just sayin'

No I didn't. You took offense and started having a whinge.

Chad wrote:

To be honest, I wrote that line off of the top of my head. Gaia doesn't echo/print their hash to you (only in gsi as far as I know), they just make it and store it in a cookie. I forgot the period in PHP acts as the +, and as for the misplaced parenthesis, everyone makes simple mistakes. There's no need to start an argument off of it, Personoid.
And I wasn't trying to be arrogant. I just saw that he had a longer line of code that could have been shortened. Some times it gets a little confusing switch from language to language.

Gaia's cookie is not an MD5 hash, and i wasn't starting an argument. Artificial posted calling a user arrogant for correcting you after you tried to correct him.