LOOK AT MY STUPID ASS PHOTOGRAPHS GO FUCK YOURSELF
I took these with a phone camera. A PHONE CAMERA. all yall photographers jelly because my camera cost 20 bucks and my pictures look way better than whatever shit you take
LOOK AT MY STUPID ASS PHOTOGRAPHS GO FUCK YOURSELF
986 views · started by minora_kitty ·
If you're trying your best attempt at trolling, this isn't the forum to do so. Head on over to the Junkyard forum.
If you're serious though, yay for taking photos of normal things in a cliche turned-sideways manner and adding poo-stains.
The first photo's composition is horrible and looks like it has been used as toilet paper a few times.
The second photo isn't too bad, however it is not interesting and does not have enough contrast nor saturation. It is overexposed. Not to mention the sky is blown out.
Third photo, all you did was take a snapshot of the ground (In a bland, non-aesthetic way I might add ) and add a poo-stain filter.
Photographers can use any type of camera to create amazing images. Even those stupid Walmart disposables. Saying that your photos are better than those with the higher end DSLR's is completely bogus though. The higher-end DSLR's have much more pixels and image quality in general than a cell phone. Plus those with DSLR's have the ability to completely control their camera and interchange lenses. We love being able to have full control and play with our equipment. (That's what she said) Maybe if you keep practicing and stop taking snapshots of things made for instagram you can create some great photos. However these photos hold no emotion for the viewer, nor aesthetic purpose.
If you're serious though, yay for taking photos of normal things in a cliche turned-sideways manner and adding poo-stains.
The first photo's composition is horrible and looks like it has been used as toilet paper a few times.
The second photo isn't too bad, however it is not interesting and does not have enough contrast nor saturation. It is overexposed. Not to mention the sky is blown out.
Third photo, all you did was take a snapshot of the ground (In a bland, non-aesthetic way I might add ) and add a poo-stain filter.
Photographers can use any type of camera to create amazing images. Even those stupid Walmart disposables. Saying that your photos are better than those with the higher end DSLR's is completely bogus though. The higher-end DSLR's have much more pixels and image quality in general than a cell phone. Plus those with DSLR's have the ability to completely control their camera and interchange lenses. We love being able to have full control and play with our equipment. (That's what she said) Maybe if you keep practicing and stop taking snapshots of things made for instagram you can create some great photos. However these photos hold no emotion for the viewer, nor aesthetic purpose.
..they look like you took them with a phone.
The last one's not too bad with the filters though.
[Edit: Highlighted so hopefully nobody misses the response. How do they look? Well they look like you took them with a phone. I know it's obvious, but what else do you want me to say? They're not shit, they're not good, they just look like regular phone pictures. Which they are. So you pretty much answered your own question]
The last one's not too bad with the filters though.
[Edit: Highlighted so hopefully nobody misses the response. How do they look? Well they look like you took them with a phone. I know it's obvious, but what else do you want me to say? They're not shit, they're not good, they just look like regular phone pictures. Which they are. So you pretty much answered your own question]
minora_kitty wrote:NO SHIT?
Total Shit!
I'm really glad you cared enough to take the time to go out and hack on photographers though.
You're either butthurt or a really dedicated photographer.
To both of which, I congratulate you and wish you the best.
You've got my support <3
Nevik wrote:Maybe because.... they were?!!!
Fix'd my post.
I'm surprised you didn't really get it.
Being a photographer, and this being the art forum, Minora posted photographs so it's my job to critique it.
My critique is:
It looks like it was taken from a phone.
It's not good
It's not bad
It's just phone quality.
so what?
lol