Printable View
I've seen this on another hacking site. More so for game hacks ( aimbots etc.. )
Where the moderators/staff have to approve of a program that it is safe before it is allowed to be downloaded.
I suggest this should be added since there are many people who will download something without even reading. ( Yes you may say this is " their fault for not reading " ) but shouldn't we as a community do the best to protect the members we want to keep?
Just a suggestion.
I like the idea but the problem is games staff don't play. It'd be pretty hard to check those hacks.
Don't think you need to have a game installed to check if it is infected do you? :XQuote:
Originally Posted by Defy
(the bot/hack i mean.)
Infected no...Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin
To see if it works yes. I was thinking about another forum who does this.
Well to see if it works you could have specified people for certain games.Quote:
Originally Posted by Defy
Or a person who will be willing to install multiple games. (F2P preferably)
Infect just anyone who has the ability to do so. Preferably with someone with a secondary computer so their main one won't get ruined by a rogue virus.
I thought this meant that we could download Moderator privileges.
There is a rule for this, but no one ever follows it. Maybe we should start punishing those who don't follow that rule as well.
Or maybe we just need a new download system...
Like that Download II plugin. People submitted their programs to the Download section, then a moderator would have to approve it and then it would be listed.
This is true. Maybe Thomas can do something like that. He will just need to see if the plugin is compatable.Quote:
Originally Posted by TEMPTii
sounds like a good idea but sounds like alot of work for the moderators definetly if they started to get a flash mob of game hacks to check
rofl ok new update guys... consult the Thomas for further information
Except that people dont turn out new hacks like its butter. It takes a little bit of time fo a new hack to be made.Quote:
Originally Posted by richboy
yeah but it doesnt necessarily have to be a new fancy bot, there can still be like the newbs making simple bots and whatnot that could spam it up like ive heard with the 500000 auto refreshers :\
this is true. there are many things that are useless that come out. But I think I can come up with an idea to solve some of that.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonic_benny