I would say talk to boobearsh for buying gaiaonline. I gave him 80k I think and he gave me an item worth twice that. I went first.
Oh wait you fucked up with him. Damnnn.
Printable View
I would say talk to boobearsh for buying gaiaonline. I gave him 80k I think and he gave me an item worth twice that. I went first.
Oh wait you fucked up with him. Damnnn.
Tits or GTFO
Sprinkles and balloons.
Niqqa.
Niqqa.
Niqqa.
You're really infracting me for calling someone retarded. Retard is not a hostile word because it relates to an everyday being. Its not derogatory. And moron. That's just a word for a lack of intellectuality. Not derogatory. I could understand if you infracted me for calling him a "******" or "queer" because those words are derogatory. That would be flaming. Harassing another member with words used for hatred, that's flaming. Two words that are used in the everyday English dictionary is not flaming. Hell my teachers call me a moron. Should I report them for flaming? I would either like this infraction reviewed by another moderator, or removed.
Thanks.
You don't see people going to jail for being called moron or retarded, but there are cases of people being sued and fined for harassment using real derogatory words such as queer,******,nig*er,etc. Because those are actually words of harassment. I would be glad to pull up a few court cases on somebody being called derogatory words. Never will you see another person being fined, jailed, or sued. For using the words retard, and moron.
Plenty of other people have called users worse names than that the past week, why am I the only one being infracted? This is unjust and unfair.
We've locked and removed many threads in the past week, but as I stated, you've been warned multiple times about flaming.
Also, context means a lot, you clearly meant it in an offensive way.
No, this is unfair. And the 2nd time now. Your last infraction to me was unfair also. I had to have it removed. Please let another administrator handle this problem. Thanks.
I don't want a warning. I'm aware im past that. I want it removed completely.
Context does not mean anything over the internet. I'm not here face to face, so you cannot interpret how I would of spoken those words.
You did not had the last infraction removed, I meant both yours and the other guy's to be warnings, and I asked Google to change them.
No, Google had to go and review what was said. Please just leave this for another administrator to review. I'm not going to continue arguing with you.
Infraction is different than a warning. So it was removed.
lol its always funny how they think they are the only ones getting infracted but they can't see whats going on over here.
Thank you .
@taz, you can see what's going on. It shows up as a little red flag at the bottom of your post.
Yea, Okay thanks for your kind wonderful input taz. Much appreciated.
Nah, id rather have the truth, than you agree and kissass to me.